US Journal Review

US Journal Review - Right Center Bias - ConspiracyFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Update: This Source is no longer online

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda

US Journal Review is an extreme right-wing blog without an about page. All articles reviewed were pro-right and anti-left. The content of headlines and articles use loaded words and most times quote sources that are right biased or questionable such as the Gateway Pundit. For example, the headline on the front page of the website says “CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX”, however when you click on it the headline changes to PARIS CLIMATE AGREEMENT FALLING APART AS COUNTRIES CAN’T KEEP PLEDGE, OBAMA, GORE, LAPDOG MEDIA ALL SILENT. This is misleading because in the article they do not mention anything about a hoax. This is a classic clickbait tactic. In another case, they claim that in Hillary Clinton’s emails she detailed 5 different way to murder Chris Stevens in Benghazi. This is 100% false as the emails simply state where Chris Stevens is traveling to and his agenda. This is a conspiracy theory. Due to extreme right-wing bias, poor sourcing, promotion of conspiracies, misleading wording, and clickbait headlines, we rate US Journal Review as a questionable source. (M. Huitsing 7/30/2017)


Last Updated on October 17, 2020 by Media Bias Fact Check

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources