Divided We Fall – Bias and Credibility

Divided We Fall - Least Biased - CredibleFactual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, based on our analysis, Divided We Fall aims for balanced reporting by including diverse perspectives and well-sourced information; therefore, we rate them as least biased. However, the use of some sources with mixed or questionable credibility earns them Mostly Factual rather than high for factual reporting.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: United States
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Divided We Fall is a non-profit 501(c)(3) news publication that aims to foster free speech and bipartisan dialogue among the politically engaged. It is based in Washington, DC.  

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The website is a non-profit organization and likely relies on donations for funding, as indicated by a “Donate” button on their site. Joe Schuman is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief.

Analysis / Bias

An article on the recent indictment of former President Donald Trump presents two contrasting viewpoints, one arguing that the indictment is politically motivated and the other contending that it is rooted in the rule of law. The article cites multiple sources, including NY Times, PBS, NY Post (Mixed), Daily Mail UK (Questionable), manhattanda.org, AP News, and National Review, which range from left-center to right-biased.

A second article, focusing on “AI in Arts and Entertainment,” takes a neutral stance, discussing the pros and cons of AI in creative fields. The article is well-researched and cites reputable sources like NPR. Furthermore, it’s worth noting that Divided We Fall also tackles highly controversial topics like abortion.



In their article “The Abortion Debate: Can We Find Common Ground?”, the site presents a balanced debate between pro-choice and pro-life camps. However, it’s noteworthy that the pro-life debater cites a source from Quillette, rated as Questionable/Mixed by Media Bias/Fact Check. This inclusion suggests a variance in source credibility, even as the article aims for a balanced presentation of views. In general, Divided We Fall is categorized as least biased based on presenting a variety of perspectives representing both sides.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, based on our analysis, Divided We Fall aims for balanced reporting by including diverse perspectives and well-sourced information; therefore, we rate them as least biased. However, the use of some sources with mixed or questionable credibility earns them Mostly Factual rather than high for factual reporting. (M. Huitsing 09/26/2023)

Source: https://dividedwefall.org/

Last Updated on September 26, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: