Good Good Good is rated Left with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal/progressive causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may use strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal/progressive causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Good Good Good Left biased based on strongly progressive story selection and advocacy for environmental, LGBTQ, immigrant, Indigenous, and social-justice causes. We rate it High for factual reporting due to extensive hyperlinking, reliance on credible sources, proper attribution of republished material, and a clean fact-check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT (-5.9)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Good Good Good is an independent positive-news and solutions-oriented media organization founded in 2017. According to its About page, its mission is to help readers “find good news, celebrate good news, and become good news” by highlighting solutions to social, environmental, and humanitarian problems.
Branden Harvey is the founder, CEO, and editor-in-chief. The organization publishes the Goodnewspaper, a daily email newsletter, podcasts, social media content, and its website.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Good Good Good describes itself as an independent media company founded by Branden Harvey. Revenue comes from advertising, clearly labeled brand partnerships, and subscriptions to the Goodnewspaper. Its website uses Mediavine advertising and also solicits commercial partnerships from brands that share its stated values.
Analysis / Bias
Good Good Good practices advocacy-oriented solutions journalism rather than traditional politically balanced news reporting. Its editorial priorities strongly favor environmentalism, LGBTQ rights, immigrant rights, racial and Indigenous justice, climate action, and other socially progressive causes. Its human-rights section explicitly emphasizes issues such as Indigenous rights, women’s rights, LGBTQ issues, and social justice.
In 10 Environmental Victories — For and By Indigenous Communities — To Celebrate, the publication describes colonization and imperialism as responsible for extensive human-rights and environmental harms while celebrating Indigenous land restoration, renewable energy, conservation, and opposition to fossil-fuel development. The article contains numerous links to established sources but approaches the subject entirely from an environmental-justice perspective.
Idaho Banned Trans People From Bathrooms. So This Group Made a Statewide Map of Where They Can Go Instead presents Idaho’s law primarily through transgender residents, LGBTQ advocacy groups, the ACLU, and research supporting transgender bathroom access. The underlying article was originally published by the nonprofit Idaho Capital Sun and is properly attributed. Its factual sourcing is substantial, but little space is given to supporters of the law or their reasoning.
Similarly, Faith Communities Become ‘Sanctuary People’ for Haitian Immigrants Facing Uncertainty focuses sympathetically on Haitian immigrants affected by changes to Temporary Protected Status and organizations helping them. The article was originally published by The Conversation and extensively links to court decisions, government documents, established news organizations, and academic sources.
Good Good Good generally distinguishes sourced reporting from advocacy and routinely hyperlinks evidence. However, its deliberate mission to highlight activists and solutions produces highly selective story choices and limited representation of conservative perspectives. The bias primarily stems from social and cultural issues rather than partisan election coverage.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate Good Good Good Left biased based on strongly progressive story selection and advocacy for environmental, LGBTQ, immigrant, Indigenous, and social-justice causes. We rate it High for factual reporting due to extensive hyperlinking, reliance on credible sources, proper attribution of republished material, and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 08/10/2026)
Source: https://www.goodgoodgood.co/
Last Updated on August 10, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources