Conspiracy Inquirer

Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Conspiracy Inquirer Questionable based on a complete lack transparency and very poor sourcing (Plagiarizing), that is surely copyright infringement.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: A Complete Lack of Transparency, Very Poor Sourcing
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 2018, the Conspiracy Inquirer is a news and information website that reports on conspiracy theories. To be clear, they do not promote conspiracy theories, but rather provide information and history about them. The Conspiracy Inquirer does not have an about page or any names associated with it.

Funded by / Ownership

The Conspiracy Inquirer does not disclose ownership and funding appears to be derived from online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Conspiracy Inquirer reports on conspiracies as well as general news with minimal bias. Articles appear to be mostly copied and pasted from other sources such as the New York Times and Wired. Many articles are not sourced at all, which required us to Google the text of the article, to determine where it originated from. It is unclear how they are getting away with this type of copyright infringement. As mentioned above this source does not promote conspiracies.

Overall, we rate the Conspiracy Inquirer Questionable based on a complete lack transparency and very poor sourcing (Plagiarizing), that is surely copyright infringement. (D. Van Zandt 2/22/2019)

Source: https://conspiracyinquirer.com

How do you rate: Conspiracy Inquirer
vote

 


We signed the Pro-Truth Pledge:
please hold us accountable.
 

Ads do not necessarily reflect the views of MBFC

Advertisements