Black Wall Street Times is rated Left with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal/progressive causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal/progressive causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate The Black Wall Street Times as Left biased due to its focus on racial equity, social justice, and community advocacy. While the site uses credible sources, its advocacy focus can shape editorial framing, limiting alternative viewpoints. Therefore, it is rated as Mostly Factual in reporting.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Black Wall Street Times was established in 2017 by Nehemiah D. Frank, who descends from families impacted by the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. Based in Tulsa’s Greenwood District, the publication covers topics focused on racial justice, community advocacy, and Black culture, aiming to provide a platform for Black voices and perspectives on current issues.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funding by / Ownership
The Black Wall Street Times is owned and operated by its founder, Nehemiah D. Frank, who serves as its Editor-in-Chief. Revenue is generated through advertisements and donations.
Analysis / Bias
The Black Wall Street Times focuses on news relevant to Tulsa’s Black community, adopting a progressive editorial stance. It emphasizes historical and contemporary issues affecting marginalized groups, particularly in Tulsa, Oklahoma. For example, articles like “Race Massacre Survivors to Present Before OK Supreme Court” highlight advocacy for justice related to the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre and stress the importance of historical accountability. Additionally, “Who Won Last Night’s Presidential Debate? Harris or Trump?” analyzes the debate, presenting Kamala Harris’s achievements and policies more favorably than Donald Trump’s.
The publication uses sources like The Washington Post and Pew Research to support its narratives, often emphasizing racial equity and social justice-related issues. Moreover, the “The Unyielding Truth of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” opinion piece argues strongly for DEI initiatives, illustrating the site’s consistent advocacy for inclusive policies, aligning with a left-leaning perspective.
These examples illustrate The Black Wall Street Times’ progressive tone and dedication to racial equity and historical justice issues, primarily catering to audiences interested in advocacy for marginalized communities.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate The Black Wall Street Times as Left biased due to its focus on racial equity, social justice, and community advocacy. While the site uses credible sources, its advocacy focus can shape editorial framing, limiting alternative viewpoints. Therefore, it is rated as Mostly Factual in reporting. (M. Huitsing 10/28/2024)
Source: https://theblackwallsttimes.com/
Last Updated on October 28, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources