Assassination Science – Bias and Credibility

Assassination Science is rated Conspiracy with Low factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

Assassination Science - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not CredibleAssassination Science - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Not Credible

Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Assination Science a Tin-Foil Hat conspiracy website based on the promotion of debunked or unproven claims.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 1998, Assassination Science is a conspiracy website covering topics such as 9-11, the moon hoax, and the JFK assassination. The editor is James H. Metzer, Ph.D.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The website does not clearly state who owns it. Donations are the primary source of revenue.

Analysis / Bias

Assassination Science primarily covers the JFK assassination from a cover-up/conspiracy perspective. They also report on 9/11 as an inside job and controlled demolition. Further, they published papers opposed to war and Neocons. In general, they promote debunked or unproven conspiracy theories. This review is kept short as they have not updated the website in many years.

Overall, we rate Assination Science a Tin-Foil Hat conspiracy website based on the promotion of debunked or unproven claims. (D. Van Zandt 5/23/2017) Updated (11/23/2023)

Source: http://assassinationscience.com/

Last Updated on November 23, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

★ SUPPORT OUR MISSION

MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.

No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.

Starting at $3 /month — ad-free + exclusive content
  • Remove all ads instantly
  • Support independent ratings
  • Cancel any time — no strings
★ Go Ad-Free — from $3/mo ❤ One-Time Donation Data API Access
Membership removes ads • Donations do not

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources