Angry White Men – Bias and Credibility

Angry White Men - Left Bias - Liberal - Progressive - Democrat - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate Angry White Men Left Biased based on wording and story selection opposed to the far right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting, despite reasonably sourced information due to a complete lack of transparency with authors, editors, owners, and funding.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Angry White Men is a blog that tracks the alt-right-white nationalist movement. The blog was founded in 2014 but did not have a name associated with it. According to their about page, the “blog is dedicated to tracking the adherents of the new white supremacy: the Alt-Right movement, neo-reactionaries, Red Pillers, Identitarians, and Dark Enlightenment thinkers.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Funding and ownership are not disclosed. There isn’t evidence of online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

Angry White Men occasionally use strong loaded language in their headlines and articles such as this: Lauren Southern’s ‘Farmlands’ Is Lazy, Dishonest, And Racist. Although the wording conveys bias, the articles are all well sourced to credible information.

The website also offers a section called Cucktionary that defines terms that are used to “expose white nationalists, adherents of the alt-right movement, and other neo-reactionaries.” Angry White Men also offers their blog roll, which consists of mostly left-leaning sources such as Media Matters and Think Progress and least biased sources such as The Conversation. In general, the information is usually factual and holds a strong left-leaning bias.



Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Angry White Men Left Biased based on wording and story selection opposed to the far right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting, despite reasonably sourced information due to a complete lack of transparency with authors, editors, owners, and funding. (D. Van Zandt 9/13/2018) Updated (02/18/2022)

Source: https://angrywhitemen.org

Last Updated on May 12, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: