American Journal of Archaeology - Bias and Credibility

PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

Overall, the American Journal of Archaeology is a Pro-Science source based on peer review and low bias.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

The American Journal of Archaeology (AJA), the peer-reviewed journal of the Archaeological Institute of America, has been published since 1897. The journal primarily features articles about the art and archaeology of Europe and the Mediterranean world, including the Near East and Egypt, from prehistoric to Late Antique times.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The Archaeological Institute of America publishes the AJA. Revenue is derived through subscription fees and donations to the Archaeological Institute of America.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the AJA publishes peer-reviewed research, studies, and news related to Art and Archaeology. All information is presented in a scientific and low-biased way. However, they do take a political stance with this statement: “The American Journal of Archaeology stands in solidarity with Black, Indigenous, and People of Color against systemic injustice in North America and throughout the world. The Journal fully endorses the AIA Statement on Archaeology and Social Justice.” In general, the AJA is a pro-science source based on peer review.