Last updated on November 18th, 2020 at 06:33 pm
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, the American Journal of Archaeology is a Pro-Science source based on peer-review and low bias.
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
The American Journal of Archaeology (AJA), the peer-reviewed journal of the Archaeological Institute of America, has been published since 1897. The journal primarily features articles about the art and archaeology of Europe and the Mediterranean world, including the Near East and Egypt, from prehistoric to Late Antique times.
Funded by / Ownership
The AJA is published by the Archaeological Institute of America. Revenue is derived through subscription fees as well as donations to the Archaeological Institute of America.
Analysis / Bias
In review, the AJA publishes peer-reviewed research, studies, and news related to Art and Archaeology. All information is presented in a scientific and low biased way. However, they do take a political stance with this statement: “The American Journal of Archaeology stands in solidarity with Black, Indigenous, and People of Color against systemic injustice in North America and throughout the world. The Journal fully endorses the AIA Statement on Archaeology and Social Justice.” In general, the AJA is a pro-science source based on peer-review.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, the American Journal of Archaeology is a Pro-Science source based on peer-review and low bias. (D. Van Zandt 12/2/2016) Updated (11/18/2020)