Women are Human – Bias and Credibility

Women are Human - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Not Credible - HateFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked per article. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Women are Human right biased and Questionable due to a lack of transparency with ownership and the consistent promotion of anti-transgender propaganda.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Anti-Transgender, Propaganda
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 2018 by Diana Shaw, Women are Human is a website that reports on the impact of the transgender movement. According to their about page, “Women Are Human is dedicated to exploring the impact of the modern gender identity ideology movement on society, particularly on women and girls, from legal identity, legal rights, safety, health, sexuality, participation in sports, politics, careers and more.”

The website lacks transparency as they do not openly disclose ownership.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Women are Human does not openly disclose ownership; however, Diana Shaw is listed as the founder and editor and is presumed to be the owner (not verified). Revenue is derived through advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Women are Human primarily publishes news stories that negatively portray transgender men who identify as female. Most stories focus on crimes committed, such as this Prominent Transgender-Identifying Figure Arrested for Terroristic Threats Against Female Bar Manager. This story is properly sourced to local Pittsburgh media. The website also frequently opposes political correctness in identifying transgender persons, such as this To Avoid Being “Hurtful” to Trans Community, Police Fail to Provide Description of Wanted Sexual Assailant. This story is also properly sourced.

When not reporting crimes and perceived atrocities by Transgender men, they provide opinion articles that utilize highly charged emotional language, such as this Dystopian Toronto: Trans Activist Mob Fights to Crush Women’s Voices. Politically, Women are Human and closely align with the right based on advocating for limited rights for Transgender persons. In general, Women are Human properly source information and report factually. However, the story selection and consistent anti-transgender advocacy render them Questionable as the perspective is 100% one-sided, which amounts to propaganda.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Women are Human right biased and Questionable due to a lack of transparency with ownership and the consistent promotion of anti-transgender propaganda. (8/3/2020) Updated (06/15/2022)

Source: https://www.womenarehuman.com/

Last Updated on July 1, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: