U.S. Climate Action Network (USCAN) – Bias and Credibility

Blue Tent - Left Center Bias - Liberal - Democrat - CredibleFactual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

  • Overall, we rate the US Climate Action Network as Left-Center biased based on advocacy for climate action. We also rate them as mostly factual in reporting rather than high due to a lack of transparency with funding sources.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

The U.S. Climate Action Network (USCAN), formed in 1989, is a key network connecting over 190 organizations active in climate change. It supports these groups in influencing local, national, and international climate policy and action. USCAN’s mission is to build trust and alignment among its members to combat climate change in a just and equitable way. USCAN is the U.S. arm of the Climate Action Network (CAN), a global network of over 700 NGOs focused on addressing the causes of global warming and advocating for equitable solutions. The U.S. Climate Action Network (USCAN) is based in Washington, D.C.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

USCAN is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, meaning it is tax-exempt and primarily funded through charitable contributions. These contributions include grants from donors like the MacArthur Foundation. However, USCAN does not publicly disclose its financial statements on its website.

Analysis / Bias

USCAN’s advocacy and policy initiatives focus on energy, environment, and sustainability. The organization collaborates with various stakeholders to develop and promote local, national, and international climate policies. With a strong emphasis on equity and sustainability, USCAN’s efforts align with progressive environmental objectives, indicating a left-leaning bias in its advocacy.

The USCAN website offers resources and information on climate change, including policy updates, research findings, and engagement opportunities, as detailed in their Vision for Equitable Climate Action (VECA) at USCAN’s VECA News. The VECA initiative aims to address the unequal effects of climate change on marginalized groups. The ‘Vision for Equitable Climate Action 2022 Edition’ references credible sources such as the IPCC, NASA, and scientific journals to support its arguments and recommendations for climate action.



Parallel to its advocacy and educational efforts, USCAN is transparent about its fund allocation, especially through grant programs. However, the organization provides less information about its funding sources.

In conclusion, USCAN holds left-leaning biases due to its advocacy for progressive climate policies and its focus on equity and sustainability. Although the organization is generally reliable in its factual reporting, it is important to be aware of the potential biases in its advocacy and policy positions.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate the US Climate Action Network as Left-Center biased based on advocacy for climate action. We also rate them as mostly factual in reporting rather than high due to a lack of transparency with funding sources. (M. Huitsing 03/25/2024)

Source: https://www.usclimatenetwork.org/

Last Updated on March 25, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: