LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate the Thinking Ahead Institute as Left-Center biased based on its emphasis on sustainability, diversity, and equity within the investment industry. The Institute’s focus on evidence-based research and collaborative studies contributes to high factual reporting.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Thinking Ahead Institute (TAI), established in 2015, serves as the evolution of the Thinking Ahead Group (TAG 2.0). It is a global, non-profit research network involving nearly 90 investment firms to enhance the investment industry for global savers and promote sustainable investments. Led by Marisa Hall, Tim Hodgson, and Roger Urwin, the Institute focuses on collaborative research and thought leadership to address investment challenges, continuing the mission set forth by TAG 2.0. The Thinking Ahead Institute has a global presence, with a significant operational concentration in the UK.
Read our profile on United Kingdom’s media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The Thinking Ahead Institute, a not-for-profit entity, operates under the umbrella of Towers Watson Limited (WTW)’s Thinking Ahead Group 2.0 and is subject to regulation by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority. The Institute’s operations are financed through membership fees collected from various asset owners and managers. These members collectively oversee assets totaling approximately US$16 trillion, reflecting the broad and significant influence of the Institute’s collaborative network in the global investment industry.
Analysis / Bias
The Thinking Ahead Institute (TAI) produces content that often centers around sustainability and diversity, reflecting a progressive perspective towards the investment industry. For example, in the article “Diversity Means Embracing Whole Identity,” Marisa Hall emphasizes the importance of organizations understanding their workforce’s identity to design effective I&D programs. She advocates for employing an “identity map” to grasp the diverse identities within the workforce, ensuring genuinely inclusive I&D policies. While this article primarily focuses on corporate strategies and workforce dynamics, it’s worth noting that discussions around diversity and inclusion (D&I) often carry political connotations. Within political contexts, the emphasis on D&I is often associated with progressive or left-leaning values, prioritizing social equity, inclusivity, and recognition of diverse identities and experiences.
Regarding sourcing, the author cites the Financial Times.
The piece “Navigating 2024: Expect the Unexpected, and Shape It” by Roger Urwin presents a forward-looking perspective on global challenges, focusing on systems thinking, tipping points, and post-truth realities. While the author acknowledges the importance of scientific insights and evidence, there is a subtle bias towards progressive values, particularly evident in the emphasis on addressing climate change skepticism and promoting collective action. The environmental movement and advocacy for environmental causes have historically been associated more closely with progressive political ideologies. For sourcing, the author draws insights from experts such as Timothy Michael Lenton, a professor of climate change at the University of Exeter, and other notable experts in the field.
In general, the Institute’s content often reflects progressive values associated with addressing social justice, promoting inclusivity, and advocating for systemic reforms to create a more equitable society.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate the Thinking Ahead Institute as Left-Center biased based on its emphasis on sustainability, diversity, and equity within the investment industry. The Institute’s focus on evidence-based research and collaborative studies contributes to high factual reporting. (M. Huitsing 03/13/2024)
Source: https://www.thinkingaheadinstitute.org/
Last Updated on April 10, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources