The New Stack - Bias and Credibility

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate The New Stack as least biased, focusing exclusively on technical and industry-related content. It is rated high in factual reporting, consistently citing industry sources and avoiding political bias.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

The New Stack was founded in 2014 and covers the cloud-native computing ecosystem, including software development, DevOps, and open-source technologies. It serves as a resource for tech industry professionals, providing in-depth analysis, news, and reports on emerging trends and innovations in software development. The New Stack is headquartered in Portland, Oregon, and was founded in 2014.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

New Stack is a subsidiary of Insight Partners, and Alex Williams is its founder and publisher. It is primarily funded through advertising and sponsorships. The platform also offers paid content, such as webinars and sponsored white papers, contributing to its revenue.

Analysis / Bias

The New Stack maintains a neutral, technical focus, avoiding political or social commentary. For instance, the article “Why Open-Source AI Has No Meaning” takes a critical stance on open-source AI, arguing that the term lacks substance given the nature of AI models. The article uses neutral language for the most part, but there are slight leanings toward skepticism regarding the feasibility and transparency of open-source AI. The tone suggests a degree of disillusionment with the commercialization of AI under the guise of open-source development. Phrases such as “fantasy” and “illusion” could be interpreted as slightly loaded, framing the discussion with a critical slant toward tech companies’ narratives on open AI. The article offers balanced analysis by referencing credible sources, such as Meta, and interviews with industry experts, like Stefano Maffulli, which helps solidify its claims. However, the skepticism toward the motives of tech giants in the open-source AI community could hint at a critical perspective on corporate control over AI development.

In the article “How Kubernetes Simplified Our Cloud and Development Platform,” the content is purely technical, focusing on how Kubernetes has improved cloud computing processes. The article relies on practical industry examples and avoids sensationalist language, remaining factual and technical throughout.

Similarly, in “DevOps Isn’t Dead, but It’s Not in Great Health Either,” the site explores the current state of DevOps. It provides detailed analysis backed by industry insights, referencing thought leaders and citing trends within the tech world. The article avoids political or ideological discussions. Both articles exemplify The New Stack’s commitment to factual reporting based on credible industry sources.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate The New Stack as least biased, focusing exclusively on technical and industry-related content. It is rated high in factual reporting, consistently citing industry sources and avoiding political bias. (M. Huitsing 09/15/2024)

Source: https://thenewstack.io/

Last Updated on September 15, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check