The New Region - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate The New Region as left-biased and questionable, based on its promotion of one-sided propaganda, minimal sourcing of information, and a lack of transparency.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda
Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.5)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1)
Country: Unknown
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

The New Region is a digital media platform launched to cover geopolitics, Middle East affairs, and international diplomacy with a strong focus on Iraqi and Kurdish political dynamics. According to its About page, the site seeks to “illuminate global fault lines and amplify marginalized perspectives.” It is structured as an independent, nonprofit news outlet, but no ownership or editorial leadership is disclosed, and no physical address, board, or editorial standards are outlined, representing a significant transparency gap. The site includes a mixture of opinion, policy commentary, and regional news analysis, with no visible advertising and no stated funding model.

Location: Unknown

Funded by / Ownership

There is no disclosed ownership or funding information on the site. The About page mentions an editorial mission but does not identify the publisher, editors, or funding sources. The absence of any masthead, transparency page, or corporate/legal disclosure indicates a 100% lack of transparency.

Analysis / Bias

The New Region leans strongly left, emphasizing anti-imperialism, Western hypocrisy, and support for stateless or marginalized groups, particularly Kurds and Palestinians. Its content is often analytical and policy-oriented but consistently lacks hyperlinks, external citations, and transparency, undermining its journalistic credibility.

In Confederalism: Iraq’s last best option, the site argues for a confederal model in Iraq to address Kurdish autonomy demands. Though it references figures like Mustafa al-Kadhimi and Barham Salih and draws on political theory, it offers no sourcing or links, making it more of an opinion piece than a balanced analysis.

The article Does Israel have a right to exist? adopts a highly emotional tone, accusing Western governments of complicity in genocide and rejecting Israel’s right to exist, again without any hyperlinks or verification of cited figures. While aligned with anti-Zionist and anti-colonial perspectives, it lacks nuance or counterbalance.

In Iraq’s 2025 elections: A chance for the opposition, the author reflects on Iraq’s 2021 elections and the failure of reformist lawmakers. This piece is more measured, avoiding extreme rhetoric, but still omits sourcing, reducing transparency.

The site’s regular news articles, such as this one and this one, are similarly devoid of hyperlinks, raising concerns that some may be AI-generated or pulled from secondary summaries without attribution.

The Opinion section names authors but provides no bios, qualifications, or affiliations. Articles across the site, even those of a highly technical nature, often lack basic sourcing, which limits their credibility. While the analysis is often thought-provoking, the consistent absence of citations and journalistic standards leaves the site with an appearance of legitimacy that it fails to substantiate.

Failed Fact Check

There are no known third-party fact checks or retractions involving The New Region. However, its unsourced allegations, emotionally charged framing in key articles (especially regarding Gaza), and lack of hyperlinks contribute to its Mixed rating rather than a higher one.

Overall, we rate The New Region as left-biased and questionable, based on its promotion of one-sided propaganda, minimal sourcing of information, and a lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 06/21/2025)

Source: https://thenewregion.com/

Last Updated on June 21, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check