The Media Line – Bias and Credibility

The Media Line - Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Trump - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate The Media Line as Right-biased due to its focus on Israeli perspectives while often omitting Palestinian viewpoints. Additionally, we rate the outlet as Mixed for factual accuracy due to poor sourcing practices and one-sided reporting that omits Palestinian perspectives.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

The Media Line is a non-profit 501(c)3 American news agency focusing on Middle East news. Established in 2000, it aims to provide unbiased reporting from the region, often focusing on under-reported stories and fostering cross-cultural understanding.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The Media Line generates revenue through donations. Although it claims to be ad-free, it has a webpage dedicated to advertising with them. However, we found no evidence of ads on the website. The organization is led by Felice Friedson, CEO and founder.

Analysis / Bias

The Media Line generally provides factual reporting, and much of its information can be cross-checked. However, certain articles, like “Turkey Evacuates Thousands of Citizens from Lebanon by Ship,” lack clear external sourcing. While the events reported are verifiable, the absence of hyperlinks can make it challenging for readers to confirm the details independently.

This pattern is also evident in articles like “A Year On: Can the Raging War in the Middle East End With a Cease-fire?”, which relies heavily on quotes from key figures, including political leaders, and quotes from official sources like the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry and Israeli authorities. The Media Line’s coverage related to Israel often emphasizes the resilience of Israelis and the humanitarian and logistical impacts of conflict on Israelis.



The articles frequently use emotionally loaded words to focus on the challenges faced by Israelis, such as Farmers, working despite tensions or rescue efforts during attacks. While these articles detail the hardships faced by Israelis, such as disruptions to agriculture and Innovation amid war, they often omit coverage of the Palestinian experience or the broader impacts on other populations in the region. This lack of balance results in a narrow focus that centers primarily on Israeli narratives, indicating bias through omission.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate The Media Line as Right-biased due to its focus on Israeli perspectives while often omitting Palestinian viewpoints. Additionally, we rate the outlet as Mixed for factual accuracy due to poor sourcing practices and one-sided reporting that omits Palestinian perspectives. (M. Huitsing 10/12/2024)

Source: https://themedialine.org/

Last Updated on October 12, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: