The Lund Report is rated Left-Center with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate the Lund Report as Left-Center biased, given its editorial positions that lean slightly left. We also rate them high for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.0)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Lund Report is an independent, nonprofit, online news outlet based in Oregon that focuses on health care policy, systems, and public health issues. Founded to provide in-depth regional reporting, it covers hospitals, insurers, lawmakers, and the Oregon Health Plan, aiming to increase transparency and accountability in health care.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The Lund Report operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit funded through subscriptions, donations, and grants. It shares a board and nonprofit status with the Oregon Health Forum. The outlet discloses donors contributing $5,000 or more and states it does not accept “dark money,” maintaining editorial independence from funders.
Analysis / Bias
The Lund Report is a niche health policy publication that emphasizes investigative and policy-driven journalism. For example, in reporting such as Oregon Governor asks PeaceHealth to delay, reconsider Lane County emergency room staffing, coverage is detailed, sourced, and focused on regulatory and patient impacts.
However, some content, such as How Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vaccine agenda risks a resurgence of deadly childhood plagues, reflects a public-health-aligned perspective that may lean slightly left, particularly on vaccine policy and government intervention. Reporting is generally well-sourced, often relying on experts, official documents, and republished investigative work (e.g., ProPublica). Overall, it demonstrates strong factual reporting with mild editorial framing toward public health consensus.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate the Lund Report as Left-Center biased, given its editorial positions that lean slightly left. We also rate them high for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 03/24/2026)
Source: https://www.thelundreport.org/
Last Updated on March 24, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources