- Overall, we rate the Lincoln Project Left-Center Biased based on endorsements for Democratic and Independent candidates and significant spending in favor of Democrats. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing techniques, lack of transparency in spending, and a failed fact check.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
Launched in 2019, The Lincoln Project, based in Washington, DC, is a SuperPAC founded by anti-Trump Republicans, including George Conway and former Republican political consultants and strategists. Although The Lincoln Project endorses Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden, they state, “Our many policy differences with national Democrats remain.” Please see the group’s announcement in the New York Times.
In summary, their ultimate mission is to “defeat Donald Trump and Trumpism.” They hope to accomplish this by creating viral ads, podcasts, videos, commercials, and social media messaging.
Funded by / Ownership
The Lincoln Project founders are anti-Trump Republican attorney George Conway, married to White House counselor Kellyanne Conway. Other co-founders include Republican Reed Galen, Jennifer Horn, Rick Wilson, Mike Madrid, Ron Steslowng, Steve Schmidt, and John Weaver.
When it comes to transparency regarding its spending, the campaign-finance watchdog group Center for Responsive Politics/Open Secrets reports that in regards to spending, The Lincoln Projects engages in similar processes to those of pro-Trump SuperPACs. A quote reads, “The Republican super PAC has amassed a substantial war chest, but it has come under scrutiny for funneling money to its advisory board members and spending relatively little airing political ads to influence voters.”
Revenue is derived from donations and merchandise sales. According to Open Secrets, top donors include individuals from these companies: Lone Pine Capital, Fsatc, David Geffen Company, and Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital. Finally, as of this date, they have spent $2,140,853 in favor of Democrats and $8,674,509 against Republicans.
Analysis / Bias
In review, The Lincoln Project endorsed Joe Biden for President, aiming to mobilize GOP and Independent voters against Trump in the presidential elections. The Lincoln Project mainly releases viral ads criticizing Donald Trump and his administration. For example, an ad released on 8/5/2020 scrutinizes President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. The headline reads Secretary of Failure; however, it does not contain links to the claims. The article links to a video that blames Kushner for failure to contain the Coronavirus, providing sources of information from left-leaning media outlets such as GQ, CNN, and New York Magazine.
The Lincoln Project generally supports Democratic candidates such as Steve Bullock and independent candidates such as Dr. Al Gross in Alaska. They also frequently highlight politicians who support Trump in a negative light, such as this, TRUMP STOOGE, which attempts to demonstrate how Susan Collins is weak for never standing up to President Trump.
In general, The Lincoln Project supports candidates who are opposed to President Trump. On the issues, they favor moderate conservative positions such as small government and left-leaning positions such as social justice; however, the primary objective is anti-Trump. Further, they claim in their Manifesto, “We Are Republicans, and We Want Trump Defeated.” However, based on the content of the video ads produced and significantly more money spent in favor of Democratic candidates, we determine that they are slightly left-leaning.
President Trump has criticized the SuperPAC as “Republican losers.”
Failed Fact Checks
- “Trump bailed out Wall Street, but not Main Street.” – False
- Did President Donald Trump claim Americans are “going to die” when he’s not president and call his staff “stupid” in a television interview? – False
Overall, we rate the Lincoln Project Left-Center Biased based on endorsements for Democratic and Independent candidates and significant spending in favor of Democrats. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing techniques, lack of transparency in spending, and failed fact checks. (M. Huitsing 9/11/2020) Updated (06/14/2022)
Last Updated on June 14, 2022 by Media Bias Fact Check
The Latest from MBFC Bias and Fact Checks - Media News
- The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 06/25/2022by Media Bias/Fact Check on June 25, 2022 at 10:30 am
- Daily Source Bias Check: Black Main Streetby Media Bias/Fact Check on June 25, 2022 at 8:00 am
- The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 06/24/2022by Media Bias/Fact Check on June 24, 2022 at 10:30 am
- Daily Source Bias Check: WCAXby Media Bias/Fact Check on June 24, 2022 at 8:00 am
- The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 06/23/2022by Media Bias/Fact Check on June 23, 2022 at 10:30 am
- Daily Source Bias Check: Science.Newsby Media Bias/Fact Check on June 23, 2022 at 8:00 am