RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate The Defense Post as Right-Center Biased due to its consistent framing favoring Western military priorities and geopolitical perspectives. The outlet is rated Mostly Factual, as its reporting is generally accurate but influenced by selective story choices, lack of ownership transparency, and poor sourcing practices.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.7)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Defense Post, founded in 2017, is an online publication focused on global defense, security, and geopolitical issues. It covers Africa, the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East. The Defense Post, headquartered in Washington, D.C., emphasizes telling stories from local or regional perspectives using local voices.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The Defense Post does not disclose specific details regarding its ownership or funding sources. The site generates revenue through advertising and partnerships.
Analysis / Bias
The Defense Post often reflects Western military interests, using language that highlights risks or urgency. This framing can encourage support for military actions or strategies aligned with Western geopolitical goals, such as defense spending, alliances, or interventions. For example, in the article “US DoD Wants SpaceX’s Starship for ‘Sensitive, Dangerous Missions,’” the framing highlights the essential role of private-sector partnerships in national security. Words like “sensitive” and “dangerous” convey the critical nature of these missions, reinforcing their strategic importance.
Similarly, “Russian Legislators Give Final Backing to Army Spending Surge” uses loaded phrases like “ramped up its military spending to levels not seen since the Soviet Union era” and “pumps out missiles and drones to fire on Ukraine” to frame Russia as significantly increasing its military aggression and spending, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, consistent with Western critiques of Russia’s militarization.
In “‘Record’ Drone Barrage Pummels Ukraine as Missile Tensions Seethe,” words like “record drone barrage” and “pummels” are emotionally charged, creating a dramatic depiction of Russian aggression. The article integrates content from Agence France-Presse (AFP), a credible news agency, but provides no clear attribution to individual journalists, relying on generic bylines like “Staff Writer with AFP.” While this is standard for collaborative or agency-driven reporting, it limits transparency and accountability.
The Defense Post frequently engages in circular referencing, often linking extensively to its internal content. Sections such as “War & Conflict,” “Regions,” and “Business & Technology” serve as the primary sources for further reading. While this promotes site engagement, it limits external sourcing and restricts readers’ access to broader, independent verification of claims.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate The Defense Post as Right-Center Biased due to its consistent framing favoring Western military priorities and geopolitical perspectives. The outlet is rated Mostly Factual, as its reporting is generally accurate but influenced by selective story choices, lack of ownership transparency, and poor sourcing practices. (M. Huitsing 11/28/2024)
Source: https://thedefensepost.com/
Last Updated on November 28, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources