Steadfast Daily – Bias and Credibility

Steadfast Daily - Right Bias - Questionable Conservative - Republican - Libertarian - Not Credible Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Steadfast Daily Right Biased and Questionable based on a lack of transparency, the use of poor sources, and the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 2018, Steadfast Daily publishes conservative news and opinion article summaries. The website lacks transparency and does not provide an about page, name authors, editors, or ownership. What is known is that Paul Duke publishes all articles, and the domain is registered in Iceland.

Funded by / Ownership

Steadfast Daily does not indicate who owns them. Advertising generates revenue. We have also identified that three other sites have the same privacy policy page.

Analysis / Bias

Steadfast Daily does not perform original news reporting. A typical story takes a quote from another story and then summarizes and adds opinions around the quotes. For example, in the story, CDC Makes SHOCKING Decision on Masks for the Vaccinated, the author provides a direct quote from the CDC and explains their opinion of the story. In this case, the author is straightforward in reporting, which does not support the sensationalized headline. Most headlines are highly emotional such as this Joe Biden WUSSES OUT! Says He Shouldn’t Have to Do THIS Anymore!

Editorially most stories favor the right through story selection and often promote former President Trump, such as this Trump Reinstatement Date Set, According to Mike Lindell. The source for this story is Pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell. However, to Steadfast Daily’s credit, they concluded the article with factual information “There is currently no legal or legislative mechanism by which a former President can be reinstated to the White House, which has many constitutional scholars scratching their heads at the idea.” Finally, they also reported on election fraud from a factual viewpoint during and after the 2020 election.

Steadfast Daily is right-biased based on story selection, but sourcing and information are usually factual. Unfortunately, the complete lack of transparency lowers their credibility and renders them Mixed for factual reporting based on our criteria. They have also promoted conspiracy theories related to the 2020 Presidential Election.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Steadfast Daily Right Biased and Questionable based on a lack of transparency, the use of poor sources, and the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories. (D. Van Zandt 7/28/2021) Updated (10/09/2022)


Last Updated on June 30, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: