RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate the Standing for Freedom Center as right-biased due to its consistent promotion of conservative Christian values in public policy. We rate them factually mixed due to reliance on ideological narratives, selectively sourced information, a lack of transparency regarding funding, and a failed fact check.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Standing for Freedom, formerly Falkirk Center, is an initiative associated with Liberty University, a private evangelical Christian university in Lynchburg, Virginia. The Center was established in 2019 by Jerry Falwell Jr. and Charlie Kirk. However, Falwell resigned in 2020 after personal scandals involving inappropriate conduct, and lawsuits were settled in 2024. Further, Kirk’s contract with Liberty University was not renewed. Learn more about Kirk’s departure here. The Center was rebranded as the Standing for Freedom Center to promote Christian principles and conservative values in public policy and culture.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
The organization operates under Liberty University’s umbrella and is funded through the university’s resources, donations, merchandise sales, and event revenues. However, detailed financial disclosures are not publicly available.
Analysis / Bias
Standing for Freedom presents a strong conservative and Christian evangelical bias, emphasizing traditional values and right-leaning perspectives on social and political issues. The content frequently includes opinion pieces and commentaries that critique liberal viewpoints and promote conservative Christian beliefs, often presenting information selectively and using strong emotive language.
For example, the article titled “Tracing the Hand of God Through the Storm” interprets natural disasters through a biblical lens, suggesting they are reminders of living in a fallen world and serve as calls for repentance. The article dismisses scientific explanations like climate change, labeling them as a “fabricated crisis” used by global elites. The author relies on scriptural references as evidence, with minimal engagement with scientific data or external factual sources. While this reflects the publication’s religious perspective, lacking scientific evidence limits the article’s factual reliability.
In another article, “Why Do Progressives Hate Free Speech?” the author argues that progressive politicians oppose free speech and prefer control over discourse, citing statements from figures like John Kerry and Hillary Clinton. The article selectively quotes sources, sometimes out of context, to support its narrative. For instance, it references a clip from a World Economic Forum video shared on X (formerly Twitter) where John Kerry discusses challenges in combating disinformation due to the First Amendment. By isolating this quote, the article frames it as part of a broader effort by progressives to limit free speech without providing the full context of Kerry’s remarks. Similarly, it cites a Newsweek article in which Hillary Clinton discusses the prosecution of Americans spreading disinformation. The article simplifies her statements, misrepresenting her position by suggesting she advocates for silencing free speech through legal action.
Additionally, the website promotes events featuring prominent conservative figures and politicians. For example, the “Freedom Uncensored 2024” event lists speakers such as Republican politician Nick Freitas. Including active political figures suggests an alignment with conservative political agendas and indicates involvement in partisan activities, which is notable given the organization’s affiliation with Liberty University, a 501(c)(3) entity.
Failed Fact Checks
Overall, we rate the Standing for Freedom Center as right-biased due to its consistent promotion of conservative Christian values in public policy. We rate them factually mixed due to reliance on ideological narratives, selectively sourced information, a lack of transparency regarding funding, and a failed fact check. (M. Huitsing 10/12/2024)
Source: https://www.standingforfreedom.com/
Last Updated on October 12, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources