Sovren Media – Bias and Credibility

Sovren Media - Right Bias - Questionable - Fake News - Conservative - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Sovren Media as right-biased and questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, as well as a lack of transparency, the use of poor sources, and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Sovren Media (previously known as ISE Media) is a video streaming and social media platform founded by Ben Swann in 2021. The platform claims to be “uncensored, blockchain-based, decentralized news and entertainment.” However, Sovren Media has come under scrutiny for hosting conspiracy-related content, including COVID-19 and monkeypox conspiracies. According to Axios, Swann’s credibility has faced scrutiny due to his association with conspiracy theories like Pizzagate and Kremlin propaganda involvement. The Dayton Daily News has also reported on Swann’s involvement in alt-right-related reports. It’s worth mentioning that Swann also owns “Truth in Media.”

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Ben Swann is the founder of Sovren Media. The details regarding Sovren Media’s funding and ownership are not fully transparent. Given his foundational role in establishing ISE Media, it is inferred that Ben Swann plays a pivotal role in Sovren Media’s operations. Sovren generates revenue through tipping, pay-per-view, subscriptions, NFTs, ad sharing, and sponsorships, focusing on creator earnings and Big Tech independence.

Analysis / Bias

Sovren Media, a platform known for its alternative media content, often presents perspectives that diverge significantly from mainstream narratives. For example, in the video “The COVID Awakening: When Doctors Started Asking Questions,” Sovren Media exhibits a strong bias towards alternative health narratives and skepticism of mainstream science, particularly on COVID-19 vaccines. It focuses on distrust of “big science” and “big Pharma,” discussing adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines and promoting treatments like Ivermectin, which lacks mainstream medical endorsement.

Another Sovren video, “Fed Lays Groundwork for ‘Digital Dollar’ That Would Give Gov’t Unprecedented Control’ suggests government overreach with a digital dollar, aligning with conspiracy theories. It suggests a scenario where the government could directly intervene in personal finances, a recurring notion in anti-government conspiracy theories. These theories often center around fears of excessive governmental control and the erosion of individual liberties. While concerns about privacy and governmental power in the digital age are valid, framing these concerns in a way that implies nefarious intentions without substantial evidence can veer into conspiracy theory territory. Sovren Media’s content often challenges established scientific and political narratives, appealing to audiences interested in alternative views and risking misinformation. 



In general, Sovren Media, influenced by Ben Swann, positions itself as a platform for alternative perspectives, often challenging mainstream scientific and political consensus. Its focus on conspiracy theories and alternative health narratives provides a niche for audiences seeking such content but requires careful consideration and fact-checking by consumers, given the sensitive and often controversial nature of the topics covered.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Sovren Media as right-biased and questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, as well as a lack of transparency, the use of poor sources, and numerous failed fact checks. (M. Huitsing 01/23/2024)

Source: https://sovren.media

Last Updated on January 23, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: