Scientific American

Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Scientific American a Pro-Science source based on advocating for the consensus of science and properly sourcing scientific information.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 1845, Scientific American is an American popular science magazine. Many famous scientists, including Albert Einstein, have contributed articles in the past 170 years. It is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States.

Funded by / Ownership

Scientific American is owned by Springer Nature, an academic publishing company created by the May 2015 merger of Springer Science+Business Media and Holtzbrinck Publishing Group‘s Nature Publishing GroupPalgrave Macmillan, and Macmillan Education. The company reported revenues of €1.64 billion in 2017. The magazine is funded through subscriptions and advertising. The website is funded through online advertisements and sponsored content.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Scientific American is a popular science magazine and website that covers general science, technology, health, psychology, the environment and history. There is rarely use of loaded language and all information is properly sourced. Scientific American covers science through the consensus on GMO’s and climate change. Editorially, Scientific American is not in favor of President Trump’s climate and deregulation stances as evidenced by this: Scientific American slams Donald Trump’s anti-science rhetoric in a rare op-ed.

A factual search reveals they have never failed a fact check.

Overall, we rate Scientific American a Pro-Science source based on advocating for the consensus of science and properly sourcing scientific information. (11/14/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 4/3/2019)

Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/

 

Advertisements