Rossiya Segodnya – Bias and Credibility

Rossiya Segodnya - Questionable - Propaganda - Right Bias - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, Rossiya Segodnya’s reporting is rated as Questionable due to its frequent promotion of pro-Russian propaganda. Additionally, the agency’s reliance on poor sources further undermines the credibility and objectivity of its content.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Russian Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: Russia
Press Freedom Rank: TOTAL OPPRESSION
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Rossiya Segodnya was established by a presidential decree on December 9, 2013. It is the successor to RIA Novosti and incorporates the former news service and the international radio service Voice of Russia. Rossiya Segodnya offers news in six languages and radio broadcasting in 19 countries. The agency aims to inform international audiences about Russian state policy and society.

Read how the Russian Government influences Media.

Funded by / Ownership

Rossiya Segodnya is owned and funded by the Russian Government. It operates as a media group that includes various entities such as Sputnik and RIA Novosti.  

Analysis / Bias

Rossiya Segodnya is widely recognized for its pro-Russian government bias in reporting. The agency’s content frequently mirrors the official stance of the Russian Government, leading to allegations of spreading disinformation. The Alliance for Securing Democracy has accused Rossiya Segodnya of spreading propaganda that aligns with the Russian Government’s interests to boost its online presence and masquerade as an independent platform. The article provides examples of how certain Polish blogs, such as Lega Artis, News na Dziś, and Daily Blitz, along with Zero Hedge, are involved in content laundering and the dissemination of propaganda sourced from Rossiya Segodnya and Russian state outlets.

Moreover, according to a report by Politico, Rossiya Segodnya has allocated significant funds for media influence in the United States. Between April and September 2022, $3,284,169 was directed from Rossiya Segodnya to Ghebi, a company involved in media production, including articles, newswires, and radio shows. 



The News section of Rossiya Segodnya features content related to discussions, collaborations, and events involving the Sputnik news agency and its partners. Articles like  “Russian-African Relations Discussed at Sputnik Roundtable” often echo Russian state interests and narratives, aligning with government viewpoints. Rossiya Segodnya’s affiliation with Sputnik, which is owned and operated by Rossiya Segodnya, reinforces their shared messaging and overall narrative.

During significant political events, Rossiya Segodnya’s output through its media platforms experiences surges, often reflecting pro-Kremlin perspectives. This reporting pattern indicates a distinct bias toward promoting Russian Government viewpoints.

Rossiya Segodnya’s media practices, financial influence, and affiliation with Sputnik impact the objectivity and independence of their reporting, particularly regarding their alignment with Russian state interests and narratives.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, Rossiya Segodnya’s reporting is rated as Questionable due to its frequent promotion of pro-Russian propaganda. Additionally, the agency’s reliance on poor sources further undermines the credibility and objectivity of its content. (M. Huitsing 04/25/2024)

Source: https://rossiyasegodnya.com/

Last Updated on April 25, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: