LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Public Policy Lab as left-center biased. Although the language in their project descriptions is neutral, their focus on social issues such as asylum seekers and aging policies indicates a left-leaning perspective. Factually, they are rated mostly factual due to the need for specific financial disclosures and detailed outcomes, which limits transparency.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Established in 2011, Public Policy Lab is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization founded by Chelsea Mauldin, David Gibson, and Sylvia Harris. The organization collaborates with government agencies, nonprofits, and the private sector to create solutions for public policy challenges. It is based in Brooklyn, NY. Public Policy Lab’s diverse projects cover housing and homelessness, health and accessibility, justice and violence, veterans’ services, and more. Their approach is focused on practical, community-centered solutions.
Read our profile on the United States government and media
Funded by / Ownership
Public Policy Lab is funded by various grants, donations, and project-based funding from partners and clients. These partners and funders include government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private sector entities. The Public Policy Lab has an 89% rating on Charity Navigator, earning Three-Stars primarily for its Accountability and finance metrics. The Public Policy Lab lacks transparency in financial reporting as they do not publish detailed financial documents, making it difficult to assess how funds are allocated to each project.
Analysis / Bias
Public Policy Lab’s projects employ a community-centered approach to enhancing public services. They are characterized by neutral and professional language and a focus on practical impacts.
The Reticketing Improvements for Asylum Seekers project, in collaboration with NYC’s Office of Asylum Seeker Operations (OASO) and NYC Emergency Management (NYCEM), aims to improve the reticketing process for asylum seekers by developing tools and materials through participatory design. This project involves extensive field research, including interviews and site visits, to understand asylum seekers’ needs and motivations. The anticipated outcomes, such as improved reticketing tools, will be piloted in July 2024. Verifiability is primarily through qualitative testimonials from anonymous asylum seekers and frontline staff, providing insights into the project’s impact on the reticketing experience.
The Listening Sessions with Older Americans project aims to gather input from older adults to inform a national plan on aging by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on Healthy Aging and Age-Friendly Communities (ICC). This project emphasizes the importance of direct community feedback in shaping policy. The findings from these sessions will contribute to developing research addressing older Americans’ needs and opportunities. However, the project lacks specific financial disclosures and detailed outcomes, which limits the transparency of its efficacy.
While their project descriptions are comprehensive, the absence of itemized financial information and specific realized outcomes impacts the overall transparency. Readers can explore further details and updates through the project links provided.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Public Policy Lab as left-center biased. Although the language in their project descriptions is neutral, their focus on social issues such as asylum seekers and aging policies indicates a left-leaning perspective. Factually, they are rated mostly factual due to the need for specific financial disclosures and detailed outcomes, which limits transparency. (M. Huitsing 07/07/2024)
Source: https://www.publicpolicylab.org/
Last Updated on July 7, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources