Off the Grid News – Bias and Credibility

Off the Grid News - Right Biased - Conspiracy - Not Credible or ReliableOffthegridnews.com - Pseudoscience - Conservative Bias - Not ReliableFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Off the Grid News as right-biased due to its skepticism of government regulations and promotion of survivalist ideologies, which align with conservative and libertarian views. Its factual reporting is mixed due to poor sourcing, a lack of transparency in its ownership, and the promotion of misleading and unproven claims related to science.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Off the Grid News is a website and weekly email newsletter that provides information about living and surviving off the grid. The site covers various topics, including self-reliance, emergency preparedness, self-defense, and alternative energy. It was established to offer practical advice and insights not typically covered by mainstream media. The headquarters of Off The Grid News is located in Thomson, Illinois.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Ownership information is not publicly disclosed. The site generates revenue through advertising and possibly sponsored content.

Analysis / Bias

Off the Grid News exhibits a right-leaning bias, particularly evident in its emphasis on self-reliance, skepticism of government regulations, and promotion of survivalist and prepper ideologies. The site often features articles critical of government policies and mainstream scientific consensus.

For example, the article titled; “New FDA Rules To Shut Down Organic Farming?” discusses the potential impact of FDA regulations on organic farms, presenting a critical view of government intervention. The article includes an interview with the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance executive director Judith McGeary, who expresses concerns about the rules affecting traditional farming practices. While the article provides perspectives from stakeholders like McGeary, it lacks comprehensive citations of primary sources or detailed evidence supporting the claims.  



Similarly, the article “The Absolute Best Batteries For Off-Grid Energy Systems” provides detailed information on energy storage options for off-grid living, emphasizing practical solutions and detailed information on various battery options for off-grid energy systems. The article cites IMS Research, HowStuffWorks, and inactive sources such as Home Power and discusses different types of batteries, like deep-cycle lead-acid batteries.

Moreover, the article “7 Startling Health Benefits of Beets” cites Dr. Eric Berg, a chiropractor known for promoting pseudoscientific health claims. Dr. Berg’s reputation as a pseudoscientist is well-documented on platforms like RationalWiki, emphasizing his promotion of unverified health advice and conspiracy theories. The reliance on such sources indicates a tendency towards pseudoscience. 

The site generally supports its articles with a mix of factual information and opinion and selectively presents its sources. Some articles rely on controversial or fringe sources, impacting the overall credibility.

Failed Fact Checks

  • This site has not been fact-checked by a third-party fact-checker.

Overall, we rate Off the Grid News as right-biased due to its skepticism of government regulations and promotion of survivalist ideologies, which align with conservative and libertarian views. Its factual reporting is mixed due to poor sourcing, a lack of transparency in its ownership, and the promotion of misleading and unproven claims related to science. (M. Huitsing 06/01/2024)

Source: https://www.offthegridnews.com/

Last Updated on June 1, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: