Reporters Without Borders – Bias and Credibility

Reporters Without Borders - Least Biased - Credible - ReliableFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate Reporters Without Borders (RSF) Least biased based on minimal editorializing of content. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: France
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Reporters Without Borders (RWB) or Reporters sans frontières (RSF) is an international non-profit, non-governmental organization that promotes and defends freedom of information and freedom of the press. Reporters Without Borders has two primary purposes: one is focused on Internet censorship and the new media, and the other on providing material, financial and psychological assistance to journalists assigned to dangerous areas. Media Bias Fact Check references Reporters Without Borders throughout the website.

Read our profile on French media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Reporters Without Borders is an international non-profit and non-governmental organization. Donations primarily generate revenue, and they are transparent.

Analysis / Bias

The RWB website contains information on the number of journalists killed, the predators of press freedom such as Vladimir Putin, and a map that shows press freedom by country. Reporters Without Borders also reports news that is related to the above topics. Although Reporters Without Borders is not fond of former President Trump and his attacks on credible media, there is little bias in their reports. Multiple reviews and daily use of their website by our reviewers have proven valuable and accurate for MBFC. For this reason, we rate them Least Biased and High for factual reporting.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Reporters Without Borders (RSF) Least biased based on minimal editorializing of content. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 9/17/2017) Updated (9/22/2023)



Source: https://rsf.org/en

Last Updated on April 5, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: