No Labels – Bias and Credibility

No Labels - Least Biased - Credible - ReliableFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate No Labels Least Biased based on attempting to bridge the gap between left and right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Profile: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2010, No Labels is an American political organization based in the United States, composed of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents, whose mission is to “usher in a new era of focused problem-solving in American politics.” No Labels is a movement that includes citizens, current and former members of Congress, state and local officials, and business, union, nonprofit, and student leaders from across the political spectrum who advocate a new politics of problem-solving. The group’s core mission is to organize leaders and citizens across America who want elected officials in Washington to give up their all-or-nothing partisan approach to politics and focus on solving the nation’s most pressing challenges.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

No Labels is a 501(c)(4) that is funded through donations.

Analysis / Bias

Essentially, this is a group that hopes to find bipartisan solutions to our nation’s problems. This is not really a news source, but they produce op-eds such as this OP-ED: REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC LEADERS ARE FAR APART ON INFRASTRUCTURE. HERE’S A COMMON-SENSE COMPROMISE. This op-ed first appeared on the CNBC website and is reasonably balanced in its criticism of Republicans and Democrats. Another story, THE WINDOW FOR BIPARTISANSHIP IN WASHINGTON, IS NARROWING. DON’T LET IT CLOSE also projects a centrist point of view, which of course, is a bias as well. However, since they attempt to appease both sides, we will rate them least biased for at least trying.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years.

Overall, we rate No Labels Least Biased based on attempting to bridge the gap between left and right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 5/10/2017) Updated (06/02/2023)



Source: https://www.nolabels.org/

Last Updated on June 28, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: