No Labels – Bias and Credibility

No Labels - Least Biased - Liberal and conservative - CredibleFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate No Labels on the right side of Least Biased based on attempting to bridge the gap between left and right with slightly more positions favoring the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Profile: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2010, No Labels is an American political organization based in the United States, composed of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents, whose mission is to “usher in a new era of focused problem-solving in American politics.” No Labels is a movement that includes citizens, current and former members of Congress, state and local officials, and business, union, nonprofit, and student leaders from across the political spectrum who advocate a new politics of problem-solving. The group’s core mission is to organize leaders and citizens across America who want elected officials in Washington to give up their all-or-nothing partisan approach to politics and focus on solving the nation’s most pressing challenges.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

No Labels is a 501(c)(4) that is funded through donations.

Analysis / Bias

Essentially, this is a group that hopes to find bipartisan solutions to our nation’s problems. This is not really a news source, but do occasionally publish news artlces such as this Five Facts on how Americans feel about the United States. This piece is from the right-leaning Real Clear Policy website. Another story, Donald Trump Should Never Again Be President is written by Joe Lieberman and holds a left-leaning bias. Generally, news articles present both sides and are factual.

As of the date of this review (2023), No Labels has formed a political party and is seeking to nominate a third-party candidate. No Labels has outlined a 30-point platform called The Common Sense Policy. In reviewing their policies, we found that some are right-leaning, some are left-leaning, and others are centrist. We breakdown the main points below and categorize them by bias.



Right-Leaning Positions:

  • Strong National Defense: Advocating for the most efficient and powerful military aligns with right-leaning views on national security.
  • Border Control: Emphasizing immediate control of borders and stopping the release of migrants who enter illegally is a stance typically associated with conservative policies.
  • Gun Rights: Acknowledging the constitutional right to own guns, despite advocating for keeping weapons away from dangerous individuals, leans towards a right-leaning perspective.
  • Fiscal Responsibility: The emphasis on reducing national debt and responsible budgeting is a common conservative viewpoint.
  • Energy Strategy: Advocating for an all-encompassing energy strategy, including clean energy development, shows a balanced approach but leans right due to the inclusion of traditional energy sources.

Left-Leaning Positions:

  • Women’s Reproductive Rights: Striking a balance in protecting women’s rights over their reproductive health is a stance more commonly associated with liberal views.
  • Equality and Non-Discrimination: Emphasizing respect and freedom from discrimination for all Americans aligns with progressive values.
  • Comprehensive Immigration Reform: Creating a path to citizenship for Dreamers and attracting legal immigrants reflects a left-leaning stance.
  • Healthcare Accessibility: Taking action to control healthcare costs and ensure access for all aligns with liberal healthcare policies.
  • Education Focus: The strong emphasis on education quality and global competitiveness in education is often a priority in progressive agendas.

Centrist/Moderate Positions:

  • Bipartisan Solutions: The call for Democrats and Republicans to work together on solutions is a hallmark of centrist ideology.
  • National Service and Civic Education: Promoting national service and civics education to heal political divides and engage citizens is a moderate approach, seeking to bridge partisan gaps.
  • Free Speech and Anti-Censorship: Advocating for free speech and against censorship by various entities is a position that transcends traditional left-right politics.
  • Support for Small Businesses: Encouraging the growth of small businesses and reducing regulatory barriers is a pragmatic approach often favored by moderates.
  • Housing Affordability and Veteran Support: These issues, while important to both sides, are addressed in a way that seeks practical solutions, typical of a centrist stance.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years.

Overall, we rate No Labels on the right side of Least Biased based on attempting to bridge the gap between left and right with slightly more positions favoring the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 5/10/2017) Updated (11/18/2023)

Source: https://www.nolabels.org/

Last Updated on November 18, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: