Modern Diplomacy - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Modern Diplomacy as right-biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that align with the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of ownership transparency and poor sourcing techniques.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Bulgaria
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Modern Diplomacy is an English-language website that provides qualitative analysis of international issues. It serves as a space for political commentary, policy inquiry, in-depth interviews, special reports, and commissioned research. Modern Diplomacy is Based in Bulgaria.

Read our profile on Bulgaria’s government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Modern Diplomacy is published by Independent European Media Ltd. Limited public information is available about this company, which operates without visible advertising. Therefore, the specifics of its funding model are not publicly disclosed. This lack of information leaves the public’s details of their revenue streams and financial backing unclear.

Analysis / Bias

Modern Diplomacy serves as a platform for diverse opinions and offers in-depth analysis of international issues. The language in its headlines tends to be neutral. One such article, “Europe’s Exports to Former Soviet Republics are Helping Russia Beat Sanctions,” discusses the indirect support provided to Russia through European exports to former Soviet republics. However, the article employs emotionally charged language such as “helping Russia beat sanctions,” “bolstering Vladimir Putin’s war machine,” and “completely insane,” which can strongly influence readers’ perceptions and suggest a critical viewpoint.

The article’s framing implies a critical perspective on European exports to former Soviet republics, portraying them as undermining sanctions and indirectly assisting Russia. This framing hints at a bias against these trade practices.

Regarding sourcing, the article cites data analysis from the UK television channel Sky News, Reuters trade figures, and statements from experts like Robin Brooks and a former chief economist of the IIF.

The article “Trump of America 2024” cites no external sources to support its claims or arguments. It exhibits a strong bias in favor of Donald Trump, presenting an optimistic view of his presidency without adequately addressing potential criticisms or opposing viewpoints. The language used is emotionally charged and supportive of Trump, referring to him as a “global legend” and suggesting that his presidency could bring about “magical changes.” Phrases like “his mark is now a global legend” and “his country needs a hero” indicate a biased and emotionally charged perspective. The article selectively presents facts and arguments that align with its positive view of Trump’s presidency. For example, it emphasizes Trump’s entrepreneurial background and suggests that he is uniquely qualified to lead the country toward economic prosperity. However, it downplays or ignores potential criticisms or challenges that Trump might face in office.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Modern Diplomacy as right-biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that align with the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of ownership transparency and poor sourcing techniques. (M. Huitsing 04/27/2024)

Source: https://moderndiplomacy.eu/

Last Updated on May 7, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check