MIT Technology Review

Last updated on July 2nd, 2021 at 11:17 am

MIT Technology Review - Pro Science - Credible

Factual Reporting: Very High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate MIT Technology Review Pro-Science based on the strong sourcing of information and promoting consensus in scientific matters.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 1899, MIT Technology Review is a bi-monthly magazine published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Magazine focuses on technology and innovation, as does the website. The current editor-in-chief is Gideon Lichfield.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology owns MIT Technology Review. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the magazine and website publish news on technology, technical innovation, and sustainable energy. Articles and headlines are free of emotional wording, such as This is the most precise 3D map of the Milky Way ever made. Although they rarely report on politics, they do not positively view former President Trump’s scientific positions such as The Gaping, Dangerous Hole in the Trump Administration. Finally, during the coronavirus of 2020, they have reported factual pro-science information. In general, all information is pro-science, and any bias is directed at those who reject the scientific consensus.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None to date

Overall, we rate MIT Technology Review Pro-Science based on the strong sourcing of information and promoting consensus in scientific matters. (D. Van Zandt 12/2/2016) Updated (7/2/2021)

Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News

Video Advertisement

Share: