JonathanTurley.org – Bias and Credibility

Jonathanturley.org - Right Center Bias - Republican - Conservative - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


RIGHT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.

  • Overall, we rate JonathanTurley.org as right-center biased based on criticism of Democrats and the defense of Donald Trump’s legal positions. We also rate him Mixed for factual reporting due to referencing his own writings and making statements that are not entirely true.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Jonathan Turley is an American conservative attorney, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst who has contributed to broadcast and print journalism. As a professor at George Washington University Law School, he has testified in United States congressional proceedings about constitutional and statutory issues. The website JonathanTurley.org serves as Turley’s blog. The blog includes sections on constitutional law, criminal law, bizarre academia, politics, media, free speech, science, torts, and columns by Turley himself.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funding / Ownership 

The specific ownership structure of jonathanturley.org is not explicitly disclosed on the website. Jonathan Turley likely owns and operates the platform, maintaining editorial control. While the website doesn’t display visible ads, it does promote Turley’s book through retailer links. His prominence as a legal commentator may contribute to the platform’s financial sustainability. 

Analysis / Bias 

Jonathan Turley is a renowned legal analyst whose perspectives on political and legal issues have undergone significant changes over the years, particularly on issues related to presidential authority and impeachment. It is important to note that while some observers have perceived this evolution as indicative of a shift in political alignment, Turley has emphasized his commitment to constitutional principles over partisan politics.

Early Views and Left-Leaning Stance: During President Bill Clinton’s impeachment hearings in 1998, Turley’s leanings were decidedly left-leaning. He stated that he is a liberal Democrat and voted for Bill Clinton, not a right-wing extremist. His critique extended to the George W. Bush administration, particularly focusing on Bush’s policies related to the Iraq War, torture, and surveillance.



Shifts During the Obama Years: Turley’s views continued to evolve during the Obama administration. Despite having voted for Barack Obama in 2008, he expressed concerns about the expansion of executive powers that he believed were constitutionally questionable. Issues such as drone strikes and the Affordable Care Act prompted his critical analysis. He stated that President Obama is a “perfect nightmare when it comes to civil liberties.”  

Defending Trump During the Trump Administration: Turley’s commentary marked a noticeable turn during the Trump era. He frequently defended President Donald Trump’s legal positions, especially during impeachment proceedings. This shift contrasted with his earlier stance on presidential accountability during the Bush and Obama administrations.

Criticism of President Biden: Turley’s criticism has intensified in recent years. He now regularly reports on court decisions that counter President Joe Biden or other Democratic initiatives. For example, he wrote on his website, “It is now clear that the President lied during his campaign and during his presidency” regarding his son’s business activities. Jonathan Turley’s blog posts heavily rely on his analysis, opinions, and observations. He frequently references his previous writings, creating a self-referential pattern. Turley also often employs emotional language and framing to emphasize his criticisms. For example, in his article “GoFundMe and the Nag’s Head Light: How Crowdfunding Has Become The Latest Battleground Over Free Speech,” Jonathan Turley critiques GoFundMe’s actions without citing external sources. Instead, he relies on analyzing and interpreting events to support his arguments and viewpoints.

Furthermore, Jonathan Turley’s blog posts use emotional language and framing to criticize Biden’s administration. For instance, in his opinion piece titled ‘White House Flack Raises Legal Concerns Over Spinning the Biden Corruption Scandal,’ Turley utilizes phrases like ‘insulting and taunting postings’ and ‘long on sarcasm and short on substance’ to express his dissatisfaction with the behavior of individuals involved in addressing the alleged Biden corruption scandal. Turley doesn’t provide evidence of corruption but focuses on criticizing communication style and conduct. 

In summary, Jonathan Turley’s evolving views reflect a complex interplay of legal interpretation and political dynamics. He currently focuses on critiquing the actions of the Democratic administration.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate JonathanTurley.org as right-center biased based on criticism of Democrats and the defense of Donald Trump’s legal positions. We also rate him Mixed for factual reporting due to referencing his own writings and making statements that are not entirely true. (M. Huitsing 04/04/2024)

Source: https://jonathanturley.org/

Last Updated on April 4, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: