International Journal of Public Health – Bias and Credibility

International Journal of Public Health - Pro Science - Non-Biased - Credible - Trustworthy

Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate the International Journal of Public Health as a Pro-Science journal based on peer review and a clean fact-check record. We also rate them Mostly Factual due to Frontier Media’s retractions of studies either pre or post-publication.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.1)
Country: Switzerland
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

The International Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that covers the study of public health. According to its About page, “The International Journal of Public Health (IJPH) publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and produces special issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions.”

Read our profile on the USA’s media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The International Journal of Public Health is owned by Frontiers Media SA, which is a for-profit corporation. Funding comes from digital sales of content and author fees for publication.

Analysis / Bias

The International Journal of Public Health is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to public health. The journal primarily publishes research like this: THE IMPACT OF ULTRA-PROCESSED FOOD CONSUMPTION ON HEALTH IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES.



Frontiers Media has been criticized for being a predatory open-access publisher. In short, Predatory Open Access publishing is an exploitative open-access publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without providing the editorial and publishing services associated with legitimate journals.

However, the International Journal of Public Health is a credible scientific journal, as we have not found any controversy or significant retractions. However, Frontiers Media has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate the International Journal of Public Health as a Pro-Science journal based on peer review and a clean fact-check record. We also rate them Mostly Factual due to Frontier Media’s retractions of studies either pre or post-publication. (D. Van Zandt 01/10/2025)

Source: https://www.ssph-journal.org/journals/international-journal-of-public-health

Last Updated on January 10, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: