Interesting Engineering – Bias and Credibility

Interesting Engineering - Pro Science - left Bias - Credible - Reliable

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Interesting Engineering as a slightly left-leaning Pro-Science source based on story selection that slightly aligns with the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to relying on scientific sources and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER PRO-SCIENCE (-2.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Interesting Engineering is an online publication founded in 2011, focusing on technology, science, and innovation. It provides news, insights, and analysis on advancements across various fields, including artificial intelligence, robotics, renewable energy, space exploration, and more. The website aims to inform and inspire a global audience by exploring the practical applications and implications of technological developments. They are based in New York City.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Hüseyin Kılıç is the founder and CEO of Interesting Engineering. The platform generates revenue through advertising and premium subscriptions.

Analysis / Bias

Interesting Engineering is low-biased. It generally focuses on the benefits of technological advancements while occasionally discussing ethical, environmental, or societal concerns. For example, articles on renewable energy technologies often emphasize their potential to combat climate change, aligning with a pro-environmental stance. However, the coverage tends to avoid overtly political or polarizing language, maintaining a practical and informational tone such as this Scientists catch spirals of Kelvin waves in superfluid helium for the first time.



In terms of sourcing, the website frequently cites reputable publications such as Scientific American, MIT Technology Review, and official scientific studies. However, some articles rely on press releases or manufacturer claims without critical analysis, which could limit the depth of certain reports.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Interesting Engineering as a slightly left-leaning Pro-Science source based on story selection that slightly aligns with the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to relying on scientific sources and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 02/01/2025)

Source: https://interestingengineering.com/

Last Updated on February 1, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: