Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) – Bias and Credibility

Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) - Left Center Bias - Liberal - Progressive - Democrat - ReliableFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) as Left-Center Biased due to story selection and policy advocacy often aligning with progressive perspectives, particularly in focusing on right-wing extremism and disinformation. We rate them High for factual reporting based on thorough research methodologies, credible sourcing, and the absence of failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

The Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) is a UK-based  501(c)3 non-profit organization founded in 2006. It focuses on combating extremism, hate, and disinformation worldwide. ISD conducts research, delivers programs, and advises policymakers on strategies to address radicalization, extremism, and polarized ideologies. The organization operates internationally, collaborating with governments, NGOs, and the private sector to develop strategies that strengthen democratic processes and social cohesion.

Read our profile on the UK government’s influence on media.

Funded by / Ownership

ISD is a registered charity in the UK and receives funding from government grants, philanthropic foundations, and private partnerships. Funding sources include the European Commission and organizations like the Open Society Foundations and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Detailed funding information is available on the About Us page. You can also view the board members here.  

Analysis / Bias

The Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) is dedicated to combating extremism, hate, and disinformation. It conducts research, delivers programs, and advises policymakers on strategies to address radicalization and polarized ideologies. The organization operates internationally, collaborating with governments, NGOs, and private sector partners to strengthen democratic processes.

For example, ISD has published reports on disinformation during elections, such as the study on “Information Manipulation in the 2019 European Parliament Elections“, which examines the scale and impact of disinformation campaigns. They have also analyzed extremist networks online, exemplified by their report “The Terror Times: The Depth and Breadth of the Islamic State Alternative News Outlet Ecosystem Online,” exploring the online strategies of the Islamic State group. ISD also works on hate speech and digital policy, recommending tech companies and governments address online hate and harassment through initiatives like the “Digital Policy Lab.”



While ISD strives for neutrality, the organization’s focus on right-wing extremism and certain policy recommendations reflects a slight left-leaning bias. However, ISD also addresses issues related to Islamist extremism and other forms of radicalization, indicating a broad scope in their work. The language used in their publications is academic and evidence-based, employing rigorous research methodologies, including data analytics, field research, and collaboration with subject matter experts.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) as Left-Center Biased due to story selection and policy advocacy often aligning with progressive perspectives, particularly in focusing on right-wing extremism and disinformation. We rate them High for factual reporting based on thorough research methodologies, credible sourcing, and the absence of failed fact checks. (M. Huitsing 10/18/2024)

Source: https://www.isdglobal.org/

Last Updated on October 18, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: