Institute for Historical Review – Bias and Credibility

IHR - Questionable Source - Hate Group - Right Bias - Conservative - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) as Questionable due to extreme right-wing bias, promotion of Nazi propaganda, and earning the label of a hate group.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Hate Group
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) was founded in 1978 by David McCalden, also known as Lewis Brandon, a former member of the British National Front, and Willis Carto, the head of the now-defunct Liberty Lobby. Liberty Lobby was an antisemitic organization best known for publishing The Spotlight, now reorganized as the American Free Press. IHR is best known for publishing articles and books promoting Holocaust denial. The Institute published the Journal of Historical Review until 2002 but now disseminates its materials through its website and email.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The IHR is a 501(c)(3) public-interest, educational, not-for-profit enterprise. It solicits donations and sells anti-semitic and pro-Nazi books in an online store.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Institute for Historical Review publishes news and information that promotes Holocaust denial, such as this: An Imaginary Holocaust May Lead to a Real Holocaust. In another article, there is more Holocaust denial and support of Nazism: There is No Evidence for Nazi Gas Chambers. At this point, I do not want to read more from this website as it is truly revolting.

Here is what others have said about the IHR. The Anti-Defamation League labels IHR as a hate group, as does the Southern Poverty Law Center. Auschwitz.org labels them a hate group as well as Nazi propagandists.



Failed Fact Checks

  • There is no evidence of them being fact-checked by a third party.

Overall, we rate the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) as Questionable due to extreme right-wing bias, promotion of Nazi propaganda, and earning the label of a hate group. (D. Van Zandt 12/15/2018) Updated (02/18/2023)

Source: http://ihr.org/

Last Updated on February 18, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: