Fox Interviewer - Bias and Credibility

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Fox Interviewer as Left Biased due to its editorially charged, consistently progressive coverage, especially on cultural and political topics. It earns a mixed factual rating, though the lack of transparency regarding ownership and monetization, combined with potential paid content, undermines trust. Readers should recognize it as a progressive commentary outlet rather than a neutral news source.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.9)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Fox Interviewer is a digital news and editorial website launched in 2018 by a group of journalists, according to its About page. It claims to deliver global news, opinions, and interviews with an emphasis on timely and diverse content. The Editorial Guidelines promote accuracy and sourcing, though the site provides no information about its owners, location, or editorial board.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The site lacks visible monetization, including ads, subscriptions, or a donation model. However, third-party platforms advertise paid article placements on Fox Interviewer, suggesting some revenue may come from sponsored or pay-to-publish content. The absence of clear labeling of such articles and no disclosure of ownership or funding presents a significant transparency issue.

Analysis / Bias

Fox Interviewer shows a clear progressive editorial stance. This is evident in several of its political articles, which take strong anti-Trump and pro-progressive positions:

“Trump Just Canceled LGBTQ+ Health Studies — Because Facts Scare Him” frames the former president as irrationally fearful of evidence-based health research, using highly charged and sarcastic language while defending DEI and LGBTQ+ initiatives.
“Trump’s New Voter Laws Are an Ominous Threat to American Democracy” criticizes conservative-led voting reforms, warning of disenfranchisement. The article uses credible sources and legislation links but makes no effort to present counterarguments or neutral framing.
“The Real Reason Trump Wants to Destroy the Department of Education” portrays Trump’s education policy as a targeted ideological attack, attributing motivations to him without nuance or balance. It reflects progressive skepticism toward conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation.
“RFK Jr.’s Health Plan: Fewer Vaccines, More Suffering, and ‘Wellness Farms’!” harshly critiques RFK Jr.’s public health proposals and vaccine skepticism, offering strong rebuttals in defense of established medical science and federal agencies.

While some of these articles cite credible sources, they are all editorially one-sided and feature emotionally charged headlines typical of advocacy journalism. The content appeals to a progressive readership and reinforces liberal perspectives without presenting a balanced range of views.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Fox Interviewer as Left Biased due to its editorially charged, consistently progressive coverage, especially on cultural and political topics. It earns a mixed factual rating, though the lack of transparency regarding ownership and monetization, combined with potential paid content, undermines trust. Readers should recognize it as a progressive commentary outlet rather than a neutral news source. (D. Van Zandt 03/29/2025)

Source: https://foxinterviewer.com/

Last Updated on March 29, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check