Ettingermentum – Bias and Credibility

Ettingermentum - Left Bias - Progressive - Socialist - Medium CredibilityFactual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate Ettingermentum as Left Biased due to its consistently partisan commentary, ideological framing, and activist-style political analysis. We also rate the site Mostly Factual because while the commentary often references real events and historical context, the absence of author transparency, limited sourcing, and opinion-heavy presentation prevent a higher factual reporting rating.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.4)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.6)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Ettingermentum is an independent Substack-based newsletter focused on American politics, elections, and history from a left-wing perspective. The site launched as a commentary-driven publication and publishes long-form political analysis, opinion essays, and podcast content. The author writes under the pseudonym “ettingermentum,” and no real name, biography, or professional background is disclosed on the site’s About page.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Ettingermentum is operated as an independent Substack newsletter and is funded through reader subscriptions, as indicated by its subscription prompts and podcast offerings on Substack. The true identity of the owner/editor is not disclosed, and there is no transparency page outlining finances, affiliations, or editorial governance.

Analysis / Bias

Ettingermentum is a clearly opinionated political commentary outlet advocating from a left-wing ideological perspective. The site primarily publishes long-form essays analyzing U.S. political parties, elections, and leadership through an explicitly progressive lens, often criticizing centrist Democrats and Republican figures alike.

Articles such as The Art of the Fold, Who Should Replace Schumer and Jeffries?, and Donald Trump Is the Worst President of All Time rely heavily on rhetorical argumentation, ideological interpretation, and normative judgments rather than neutral reporting. While the author frequently references political history, polling trends, and recent events, these references are selectively framed to support a predetermined left-leaning ideological conclusion. The publication does not present balanced counterarguments and functions as an analysis-and-opinion platform rather than a traditional news source.



Failed Fact Checks

  • No failed fact checks by IFCN-approved fact-checkers were found. However, the lack of transparency regarding authorship and sourcing limits independent verification.

Overall, we rate Ettingermentum as Left Biased due to its consistently partisan commentary, ideological framing, and activist-style political analysis. We also rate the site Mostly Factual because while the commentary often references real events and historical context, the absence of author transparency, limited sourcing, and opinion-heavy presentation prevent a higher factual reporting rating. (D. Van Zandt 12/18/2025)

Source: https://www.ettingermentum.news/

Last Updated on December 18, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: