Drop Site News - Bias and Credibility

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Drop Site News as Left Biased for its consistent opposition to U.S. interventionist policies and editorial perspectives that align with the progressive left. Its reporting is rated Mostly Factual due to one-sided narratives shaped by its strong anti-war stance.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.4)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.2)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Drop Site News was launched in July 2024 by journalists Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Grim. The site focuses on investigative journalism to uncover abuses of power, especially in conflicts involving the U.S. Its content strongly critiques U.S. military interventions and foreign policy, with a stated mission of challenging government accountability and corporate influence. The outlet produces newsletters, articles, and podcasts, with contributors frequently addressing themes of anti-war advocacy. Drop Site News operates out of Washington, D.C.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Drop Site News is owned by its co-founders, journalists Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Grim. It operates as a reader-supported platform and is fiscally sponsored by the Social Security Works Education Fund, allowing it to accept tax-deductible donations while maintaining editorial independence.

Analysis / Bias

Drop Site News maintains a distinctly progressive editorial perspective, notably opposing U.S. wars and interventionist policies. This is reflected in articles like “The ‘Ceasefire’ in Lebanon is a Ticking Bomb,” which critiques the U.S. for granting Israel significant latitude in military actions during the ceasefire. The article includes references to the Times of Israel and Israeli government statements, but it also cites sources such as Al-Mayadeen, which is known for its pro-Iran perspective.

Another article, “It’s the Wars, Stupid,” argues that Democratic Party militarism alienates voters. This piece uses subjective language, including phrases like “war-happy,” and cites progressive outlets such as The Intercept.

While Drop Site News does link to credible sources such as the Financial Times, much of its framing is editorial, relying on language that aligns with anti-interventionist ideology.

Besides anti-war narratives, the editorial perspective also strongly leans left. For example, the articles “How Israel’s Elite Intelligence Unit Targets Queer Palestinians in the West Bank” and “U.S. Officials Who Hated ‘Woke’ Investing Won’t Stop Buying Israel Bonds” align with progressive values by highlighting systemic injustices and demanding accountability. The first critiques Israeli intelligence targeting LGBTQ+ Palestinians, spotlighting discrimination against marginalized communities, while the second exposes the hypocrisy of U.S. officials opposing ESG investing yet supporting underperforming Israel Bonds. Both articles reflect progressive priorities like social equity, ethical governance, and human rights.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Drop Site News as Left Biased for its consistent opposition to U.S. interventionist policies and editorial perspectives that align with the progressive left. Its reporting is rated Mostly Factual due to one-sided narratives shaped by its strong anti-war stance. (M. Huiting 11/28/2024) Updated (12/31/2024)

Source: https://www.dropsitenews.com/

Last Updated on December 31, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check