RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate The Center for Renewing America as Right-Biased due to its strong promotion of conservative, pro-Trump ideologies. We also rate them as Mixed for Factual Reporting due to selective sourcing, promoting conspiracy theories, and using unreliable sources, which affects content reliability.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
The Center for Renewing America, also known as America Renewing, is a conservative 501(c)(3) organization established in 2021 by Russ Vought, co-author of Project 2025. The center promotes conservative policies and prepares for future conservative leadership. They are based in Washington, DC.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
The Center for Renewing America is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. However, it has not provided details about its financial backers or disclosed major donors. According to The Detroit News, Russ Vought has not shared specific information about its fundraising sources.
Analysis / Bias
The Center for Renewing America promotes conservative ideologies and policies aligned with former President Trump’s political movement. The organization focuses on right-wing priorities, such as opposing critical race theory, economic nationalism, and immigration.
For instance, in the article “Tariffs and American Sovereignty,” the center argues in favor of tariffs to protect domestic industries, framing the issue in line with Trump-era economic protectionism. The article avoids discussing counterarguments, such as the potential for tariffs to increase consumer costs.
Similarly, the policy brief “The Great Replacement in Theory and Practice” discusses immigration through the lens of far-right rhetoric. The article references the “Great Replacement” theory and includes emotionally loaded language common in right-wing populist narratives. The article’s sources are often not hyperlinked, making it difficult for readers to verify information. Endnotes rely on questionable sources, including Big League Politics, a website that promotes conspiracy theories. When attempting to access this source, the link leads to an error page as the website no longer exists. Additionally,Big League Politics has been flagged for publishing misleading content.
In contrast, the article “The H-1B Visa Program Harms American Workers and Should Be Repealed” relies on various sources, such as The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and government documents. However, it selectively cites sources, often omitting counterpoints. For instance, it focuses on the negative impact of the H-1B visa program on American workers but does not adequately address the economic benefits or contributions of H-1B workers to innovation and the U.S. economy. This selective sourcing creates a skewed narrative, leaning heavily toward one side of the issue while downplaying or ignoring evidence that could contradict its claims.
In brief, the center’s sourcing practices differ among articles. Some articles lack proper hyperlinks or rely on misleading references; others, while grounded in credible sources, lack balance by cherry-picking data and ignoring alternative perspectives, resulting in a one-sided conservative-leaning analysis that could potentially mislead readers.
Failed Fact Checks
- A third-party fact checker has not checked them.
Overall, we rate The Center for Renewing America as Right-Biased due to its strong promotion of conservative, pro-Trump ideologies. We also rate them as Mixed for Factual Reporting due to selective sourcing, promoting conspiracy theories, and using unreliable sources, which affects content reliability. (M. Huitsing 10/10/2024)
Source: https://americarenewing.com/
Last Updated on October 10, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

