Black Wall Street Times – Bias and Credibility

Black Wall Street Times - Left Biased - Progressive - Liberal - Democrat - CredibleFactual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate The Black Wall Street Times as Left biased due to its focus on racial equity, social justice, and community advocacy. While the site uses credible sources, its advocacy focus can shape editorial framing, limiting alternative viewpoints. Therefore, it is rated as Mostly Factual in reporting.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

The Black Wall Street Times was established in 2017 by Nehemiah D. Frank, who descends from families impacted by the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. Based in Tulsa’s Greenwood District, the publication covers topics focused on racial justice, community advocacy, and Black culture, aiming to provide a platform for Black voices and perspectives on current issues.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funding by / Ownership

The Black Wall Street Times is owned and operated by its founder, Nehemiah D. Frank, who serves as its Editor-in-Chief. Revenue is generated through advertisements and donations.

Analysis / Bias

The Black Wall Street Times focuses on news relevant to Tulsa’s Black community, adopting a progressive editorial stance. It emphasizes historical and contemporary issues affecting marginalized groups, particularly in Tulsa, Oklahoma. For example, articles like “Race Massacre Survivors to Present Before OK Supreme Court” highlight advocacy for justice related to the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre and stress the importance of historical accountability. Additionally, “Who Won Last Night’s Presidential Debate? Harris or Trump?” analyzes the debate, presenting Kamala Harris’s achievements and policies more favorably than Donald Trump’s.

The publication uses sources like The Washington Post and Pew Research to support its narratives, often emphasizing racial equity and social justice-related issues. Moreover, the “The Unyielding Truth of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” opinion piece argues strongly for DEI initiatives, illustrating the site’s consistent advocacy for inclusive policies, aligning with a left-leaning perspective.



These examples illustrate The Black Wall Street Times’ progressive tone and dedication to racial equity and historical justice issues, primarily catering to audiences interested in advocacy for marginalized communities. 

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate The Black Wall Street Times as Left biased due to its focus on racial equity, social justice, and community advocacy. While the site uses credible sources, its advocacy focus can shape editorial framing, limiting alternative viewpoints. Therefore, it is rated as Mostly Factual in reporting. (M. Huitsing 10/28/2024)

Source: https://theblackwallsttimes.com/

Last Updated on October 28, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: