PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate BioExplorer.net as Least Biased and Pro-Science with High Factual Reporting due to its reliance on scientific experts, well-researched educational content, and lack of partisan or ideological bias.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
BioExplorer.net was launched in 1999 as a biology link aggregator and has since grown into a hub with more than 1,500 in-depth articles. It attracts over 150,000 monthly visitors and is frequently referenced in scientific publications, universities, and news outlets.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Ownership and Funding
BioExplorer is managed by a global team of contributors and editors, including Anastasiia Nesterenko (Ukraine), Rejie Salazar (Philippines), and Sarmistha Ray (India). It generates revenue primarily through display advertising (Google AdSense) and affiliate links (e.g., recommended book lists).
Analysis / Bias
BioExplorer functions as a pro-science educational resource publishing evidence-based articles on topics such as Marine Biology and Top Biology Discoveries. Articles are written by academically qualified experts, peer-reviewed internally, and avoid sensationalism. For instance, the “Marine Biology 101” article provides clear explanations of ecosystems and species without a political or commercial slant.
The site maintains neutrality, focusing on accessible science communication rather than advocacy. Its presentation emphasizes simplification of complex biology while citing credible sources (NIH, News-Medical, universities).
Failed Fact Checks
-
None found.
Overall, we rate BioExplorer.net as Least Biased and Pro-Science with High Factual Reporting due to its reliance on scientific experts, well-researched educational content, and lack of partisan or ideological bias. (D. Van Zandt 10/01/2025)
Source: https://www.bioexplorer.net/
Last Updated on October 1, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources