These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate the Administrative Sciences Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting due to being published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals.
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Press Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
The Administrative Sciences Journal is published by MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute), formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland. The journal covers theoretical and empirical work on organization studies published quarterly online. MDPI publishes over 400 journals.
Read our profile on Swiss Media and Government.
Funded by / Ownership
The publisher of the Administrative Sciences Journal is MDPI AG, which Shu-Kun Lin owns. Here is the list of the Management Team. According to “MDPI Open Access Information and Policy.” MDPI articles and all its journals are open access where authors pay a one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the costs of peer review administration and management; here is “General Information on MDPI’s Article Processing Charges (APC).”
Analysis / Bias
The Administrative Sciences Journal covers theoretical and empirical work on organization studies. Studies are published via open access, such as this Choosing Optimal Omnichannel Coupon Redeeming Options in Multiple Channel Settings. Like all others reviewed, this study is Pro-Science, well-researched, and low-biased.
While the Administrative Sciences Journal has not failed a fact-check, its publisher has faced criticism as an open-access predatory journal. Read our full review on MDPI.
Failed Fact Checks
- None for Administrative Sciences Journal; however, other MDPI journals have failed fact checks.
Overall, we rate the Administrative Sciences Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting due to being published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals. (M. Huitsing 10/09/2022)
Last Updated on October 9, 2022 by Media Bias Fact Check
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources