Answers in Genesis – Bias and Credibility

Answers in Genesis - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not Credible - ChristianAnswers in Genesis - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Not Credible - ChristianFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Answers in Genesis a Quackery level pseudoscience website that rejects the consensus of science regarding evolution.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 1997, Answers in Genesis (AiG), headed by Ken Ham, is a Christian apologetics ministry that promotes “creation science.” According to their about page, “Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (i.e., Christianity-defending) ministry, dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively.”

Ken Ham is also the creator of the Creation Museum in Tennesse that promotes pseudoscientific, young-Earth creationist (YEC) explanation of the universe’s origin based on a literal interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative in the Bible.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Answers in Genesis is a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Donations generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Answers in Genesis is a website that publishes news and information regarding young-earth creationism. The website rejects the scientific consensus on evolution such as this: Evolution? Impossible!. This review will be short. They reject science and interpret Genesis literally. Since we rate sources based on scientific consensus, Answers in Genesis is pseudoscientific by our methodology. A disclosure: several years ago, I refuted Ken Ham with scientific evidence on his Facebook page and was promptly blocked without explanation.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years. See above as creationism is an unproven pseudoscience.

Overall, we rate Answers in Genesis a Quackery level pseudoscience website that rejects the consensus of science regarding evolution. (D. Van Zandt 8/22/2016) Updated (02/18/2022)


Last Updated on May 12, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: