PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate Accounting History Review as a Pro-Science source. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to rigorous peer review and a clean fact-check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.5)
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Accounting History Review is a peer-reviewed open-access journal published by Taylor & Francis that covers Accounting. According to its about page, “Accounting History Review is an international forum for research into the history of accounting thought, practice, and institutions. Our primary goal is the publication of scholarly articles that investigate accounting and its implication in diverse social, cultural, and multi-faceted institutional contexts across space and time.”
Taylor & Francis is an academic and professional publishing platform that hosts a wide range of peer-reviewed journals and research articles across various disciplines, including social sciences, humanities, health sciences, engineering, and more. Founded in 1798, Taylor & Francis is a major global publisher that provides resources for researchers, scholars, and students.
Read our profile on the UK’s media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Informa PLC, a multinational publishing, business intelligence, and exhibitions group, owns the publisher Taylor & Francis. It generates revenue from institutional subscriptions, pay-per-view article purchases, and through partnerships with academic institutions.
Analysis / Bias
Accounting History Review is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to Accounting. An example article is as follows: Corporate depreciation practice in early twentieth-century Japan: a comparative analysis of the textile industry.
Taylor & Francis is an open-access publisher of scientific journals. There are two types of Open Access Journals, legitimate and predatory, both of which charge the author for publication. Predatory journals often lack peer review and are generally considered not credible. Taylor & Francis is considered a legitimate, open-access publisher that is frequently indexed in PubMed.
Although Taylor & Francis has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed, Accounting History Review publishes credible scientific studies that are factual and appropriately peer-reviewed.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Accounting History Review as a Pro-Science source. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to rigorous peer review and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 01/05/2025)
Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rabf21
Last Updated on January 5, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources