PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate the Science History Institute as a Pro-Science source based on its efforts to preserve history.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: United States
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Founded in 1982, The Science History Institute is an institution that preserves and promotes understanding of the history of science. Located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, it includes a library, museum, archive, research center, and conference center. The President is David Allen Cole
Funded by / Ownership
The Science History Institute is supported through donations.
Analysis / Bias
The Science History Institute does not really publish news. It simply is an institute that “collects and shares the stories of innovators and of discoveries that shape our lives. They preserve and interpret the history of chemistry, chemical engineering, and the life sciences.” There is not much to say here. This is a pro-science source with the aim to preserve scientific history.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate the Science History Institute as a Pro-Science source based on its efforts to preserve history. (D. Van Zandt 12/20/2018) Updated (9/21/2023)
Source: https://www.sciencehistory.org/
Last Updated on September 21, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources