Daily Source Bias Check: Vaxopedia

Vaxopedia - Pro Science - Credible

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, Vaxopedia is a pro-science source that properly sources and adheres to the consensus of science regarding vaccines.

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
Source: https://vaxopedia.org

Read Detailed Report


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22.8K other subscribers

1 Comment on "Daily Source Bias Check: Vaxopedia"

  1. Richard Babylon | November 16, 2022 at 12:55 pm |

    I hadn’t heard of this source, and its name suggested it could go either way. I’m glad it’s evidently a credible, pro-science one, since that’s one of the biggest things the world needs more of. That’s true even for those who least realize or take for granted the priceless benefits of science, and specifically vaccines.

    Having said that, I wonder if all of the “Recommended Sites” listed in a side column on the Vaxopedia home page are equally credible. Most or all are unfamiliar to me.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.