PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, Vaxopedia is a pro-science source that properly sources and adheres to the consensus of science regarding vaccines.
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Source: https://vaxopedia.org
Read Detailed Report
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources
I hadn’t heard of this source, and its name suggested it could go either way. I’m glad it’s evidently a credible, pro-science one, since that’s one of the biggest things the world needs more of. That’s true even for those who least realize or take for granted the priceless benefits of science, and specifically vaccines.
Having said that, I wonder if all of the “Recommended Sites” listed in a side column on the Vaxopedia home page are equally credible. Most or all are unfamiliar to me.