LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, we rate Watcher.Guru as Least Biased due to its focus on cryptocurrency and financial markets without overt political or ideological leanings. However, its reliance on speculative content, inconsistent sourcing, and lack of investigative depth lead to a factual reporting rating of Mixed. While some articles cite credible industry sources, others lack references or critical analysis, limiting reliability.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.8)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.7)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Watcher.Guru is an online news outlet covering cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and financial trends. Launched in the early 2020s, the site aims to provide timely updates and insights into the rapidly evolving crypto industry, targeting novice and experienced investors. According to SignalHire, the company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Watcher.Guru’s ownership is not publicly disclosed. The publication primarily derives revenue from advertising and affiliate marketing.
Analysis / Bias
Watcher.Guru content focuses on cryptocurrency, NFTs, and financial markets, catering to readers seeking accessible, beginner-friendly updates rather than in-depth technical or critical analysis. The site emphasizes trending topics, speculative articles, and simplified guides, appealing to those interested in market buzz and practical advice. For example, articles like “Can Solana Reach $1000?” present speculative scenarios without addressing broader market challenges, while others, such as “Why 2025 Could Be Bitcoin’s Defining Year, According to a U.S. Senator,” make bold claims but lack credible sourcing or references to primary materials.
Although some articles, like “BTC As Digital Gold,” cite reputable sources such as Forbes and Reuters, the inconsistency in sourcing and reliance on surface-level insights reflects a preference for speed and engagement over investigative depth. This tendency leans toward promoting enthusiasm in the crypto space rather than providing a balanced perspective.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Watcher.Guru as Least Biased due to its focus on cryptocurrency and financial markets without overt political or ideological leanings. However, its reliance on speculative content, inconsistent sourcing, and lack of investigative depth lead to a factual reporting rating of Mixed. While some articles cite credible industry sources, others lack references or critical analysis, limiting reliability. (M. Huitsing 12/19/2024)
Source: https://watcher.guru/
Last Updated on December 19, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources