QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate U-S-News.com Right-biased, Questionable, and Low-factual due to a complete lack of transparency, reliance on questionable and frequently debunked sources, sensationalized and one-sided political content, and the promotion of misleading health and commercial claims.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, False Claims, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: Unknown
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
U-S-News.com is an anonymous news aggregation website with no verifiable ownership, editorial staff, or organizational background. The site lacks a legitimate About page, and its Privacy Policy consists of generic, template text commonly associated with default WordPress installations. Content appears to be republished or rewritten from other sources.
Location: Unknown
Funded by / Ownership
Ownership is undisclosed. The site appears to be funded through advertising and affiliate-style monetization, including promotional links and product marketing. It also links to the InfoWars Store, which sells supplements and products frequently associated with conspiracy and pseudoscience claims. The lack of transparency regarding funding and ownership raises significant credibility concerns.
Analysis / Bias
U-S-News.com is a politically charged aggregation site that republishes partisan commentary and questionable content. For example, Trump didn’t wreck NATO — he exposed its anti-US hypocrisy presents a strongly pro-Trump, anti-European narrative using loaded language such as “anti-US hypocrisy” and “deadbeat” NATO members, reflecting clear right-wing bias. Another article, Fraud king has few answers, uses inflammatory language (“fraud king,” “schemin’”) to attack California Governor Gavin Newsom, indicating editorializing rather than objective reporting.
The site also publishes highly questionable health and promotional content, such as Why Is RFK Jr. Wearing the #1 Fastest Growing D.S. Product?, which promotes unproven “stem cell” patches and includes exaggerated medical claims without credible scientific sourcing. This article originates from 100PercentFedUp, a known low-credibility source, and includes affiliate-style marketing language and testimonials rather than evidence-based information.
Overall, the site demonstrates strong right-wing bias, reliance on low-credibility sources, sensationalized language, and the promotion of pseudoscience and misleading claims.
Failed Fact Checks
- While U-S-News.com itself has not been directly fact-checked, it routinely republishes content from sources such as 100PercentFedUp and similar outlets that have failed fact checks by IFCN-approved organizations.. The association with these sources lowers overall credibility.
Overall, we rate U-S-News.com Right-biased, Questionable, and Low-factual due to a complete lack of transparency, reliance on questionable and frequently debunked sources, sensationalized and one-sided political content, and the promotion of misleading health and commercial claims. (D. Van Zandt 04/06/2026)
Source: https://u-s-news.com/
Last Updated on April 6, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources