The Limited Times ( – Bias and Credibility

NewsRND - Least Biased - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate NewsRND as Least Biased and a Questionable source due to poor sourcing and a complete lack of transparency.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Unknown
Press Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History (The Limited Times) is a news aggregator covering various topics, including politics, sports, tech, and life. The website lacks transparency as they do not have an about page or disclose its location and ownership. 

Funded by / Ownership

Ownership of is not specified, and advertisements generate revenue. Another website called the Teller Report has a similar look and the same tagline, “Now you can see Non-English News,” indicating the same person or company may own them.

Analysis / Bias

NewsRND republishes articles from various sources, including those that may have different levels of factual reporting and bias. For example, it republished an article from Le Parisien titled “Tennis: ‘He raped me three times a day,’ the terrible testimony of Angélique Cauchy.” The article contains emotionally charged words like “terrible,” “chilling,” and “ordeal.” Given the sensitive and serious nature of the topic, such wording may be appropriate to convey the gravity of the situation. The article cites a previous report from Franceinfo and includes quotes from Angélique Cauchy’s testimony, adding credibility to the information presented.

Another article analyzed, “Oise: in the run-up to the Olympics, the disabled sports committee expects “a lot of requests for registration.” was also republished from Le Parisien. The headline seems straightforward and does not contain biased wording.

Lastly, NewsRND republishes articles from sources like Al Jazeera, which has a factually mixed rating. In general, NewsRND republishes news from a wide variety of sources, some of which may not always be factual. Further, its complete lack of transparency lowers its credibility level.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None, as they are a news aggregator; however, some of the sources they rely on have failed fact checks.

Overall, we rate NewsRND as Least Biased and a Questionable source due to poor sourcing and a complete lack of transparency. (M. Huitsing 09/07/2023)


Last Updated on September 7, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: