LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, we rate The Bureau as Least Biased due to its investigative focus on systemic corruption and institutional accountability across political spectrums, including critiques of the Trudeau administration. Its reporting is Mostly Factual, supported by credible sources and expert commentary, though reliance on whistleblower accounts and occasional speculative framing slightly reduce transparency.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-1.4)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.8)
Country: Canada
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
The Bureau is an investigative journalism platform founded by Sam Cooper, a Canadian journalist who was recognized for his work on corruption and disinformation. Hosted on Substack, it focuses on anti-corruption efforts, countering disinformation, and supporting whistleblowers.
Read our profile on the Canadian media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The Bureau is independently operated by Sam Cooper. As a Substack publication, it generates revenue through subscriptions from its readership.
Analysis / Bias
The Bureau demonstrates a strong investigative focus, particularly on issues such as systemic corruption, financial misconduct, and institutional accountability. Its reporting often centers on politically and socially charged topics, including allegations of Chinese influence in Canadian politics and real estate markets. For instance, the article “Fake Chinese Income Mortgages Fuel Toronto Real Estate Bubble” examines alleged mortgage fraud involving Chinese diaspora buyers based on whistleblower testimony and internal bank documents. While this reporting raises legitimate questions, its reliance on unverifiable evidence and charged language, such as “fake Chinese income” and “proceeds of crime,” diminishes neutrality and transparency.
Similarly, the article “CSIS May Have Revised Michael Chan Warrant” explores allegations of political interference in a national security warrant. While grounded in testimonies and internal communications, the article lacks hyperlinks to key evidence and relies on speculative language to frame its narrative, which can reduce reader trust.
However, the broader issue of Chinese influence in Canada, as highlighted by Sam Cooper and corroborated by independent sources like ProPublica, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) reports, and Global News, adds credibility to The Bureau’s reporting focus. These sources confirm that allegations of covert funding, political interference, and financial misconduct tied to Chinese interests are supported by intelligence findings and ongoing government investigations. This context situates The Bureau’s work within a legitimate investigative framework, even if individual articles occasionally lean on speculative or emotive framing.
Despite its strengths, The Bureau often uses dramatic phrasing and whistleblower accounts that lack direct public corroboration, making its reporting appear less neutral. The lack of consistent hyperlinking to raw evidence also reduces transparency, leaving critical information unverifiable. While these elements highlight important systemic concerns, they may veer into conspiratorial territory without additional substantiation or balanced perspectives.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate The Bureau as Least Biased due to its investigative focus on systemic corruption and institutional accountability across political spectrums, including critiques of the Trudeau administration. Its reporting is Mostly Factual, supported by credible sources and expert commentary, though reliance on whistleblower accounts and occasional speculative framing slightly reduce transparency. (M. Huitsing 11/24/2024) Updated (10/29/2025)
Source: https://www.thebureau.news/
Last Updated on October 29, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources