Technology Networks – Bias and Credibility

Technology Networks - Pro Science - Non-Biased - Credible - Trustworthy

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Technology Networks as Pro-Science and High Factual. The publication sources information from reputable studies and institutions and has a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.7)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.0)
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Technology Networks is an online scientific publication that provides news, articles, and insights across various scientific disciplines, including life sciences, Genomic Research, drug discovery, and informatics. Established to serve the scientific community, it offers a platform for researchers and professionals to access the latest developments and research findings. Technology Networks is headquartered in Sudbury, England. The editorial team includes Jack Rudd, who serves as the Editorial Director.

Read our profile on UK government influence on media.

Funded by / Ownership

Technology Networks is owned by LabX Media Group, a company specializing in scientific publishing and media. LabX Media Group operates multiple brands within the scientific and medical sectors. Technology Networks generate revenue through advertising, sponsored content (whitepapers), and event promotion.

Analysis / Bias

Technology Networks maintains a pro-science stance, focusing on evidence-based reporting and peer-reviewed research. Its articles often reference reputable institutions and studies, such as the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, as well as publications in journals like Nutrients.



Technology Networks avoids politically charged topics and focuses on scientific discoveries and research findings. For instance, an article discussing caffeine’s potential effects on ADHD symptoms cites a study from Nutrients and includes input from university researchers. Additionally, Technology Networks publishes sponsored whitepapers, which, while factually vetted, may emphasize a sponsor’s products or viewpoints. Readers should approach these whitepapers with an awareness of their promotional nature. However, the papers reviewed were factual.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Technology Networks as Pro-Science and High Factual. The publication sources information from reputable studies and institutions and has a clean fact-check record. (M Huitsing 11/10/2024) Updated (12/03/2024)

Source: https://www.technologynetworks.com/

Last Updated on December 3, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: