Serious Trouble Show is rated Right-Center with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Serious Trouble Right-Center biased based on its civil-libertarian legal perspective, pragmatic institutional analysis, Josh Barro’s broader right-center orientation, and frequent skepticism toward both progressive and Trump-aligned legal arguments. We rate it High for factual reporting due to transparent ownership, experienced hosts, reliance on legal filings and public records, and a clean fact-check record, while noting that it is opinion-based legal commentary rather than straight news reporting.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.9)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Serious Trouble is a Substack-based legal podcast and newsletter hosted by journalist and commentator Josh Barro and attorney Ken White, with production by Sara Fay. The show describes itself as “an irreverent podcast about the law” and focuses on crimes, torts, civil litigation, criminal law, defamation cases, legal ethics, Supreme Court developments, and public figures facing legal trouble. Serious Trouble grew out of the earlier podcast All The Presidents’ Lawyers but broadens its coverage beyond presidents and their lawyers.
MBFC has previously reviewed two related Josh Barro projects, Central Air and Josh Barro – Very Serious, both of which reflect Barro’s centrist-to-right-center political and policy perspective.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Serious Trouble is published by Very Serious Media through Substack. Revenue is generated through paid subscriptions, podcast subscriptions, reader support, and related media activity. The site offers paid access for full episodes, discussion threads, listener questions, and community features.
Analysis / Bias
Serious Trouble is primarily legal analysis and commentary rather than straight news reporting. Its hosts generally approach legal controversies from a civil-libertarian, institutionalist, and center-right-to-libertarian perspective. Josh Barro often brings a pragmatic, market-oriented political lens, while Ken White is known for legal commentary focused on free speech, criminal defense, civil liberties, and skepticism of prosecutorial overreach.
Although the show often covers Donald Trump’s legal problems, it is not exclusively anti-Trump content. The podcast discusses legal issues involving public figures, corporations, law firms, judges, prosecutors, plaintiffs, defendants, government agencies, and political organizations. Its tone is irreverent and opinionated, but the analysis is generally grounded in legal filings, statutes, court rulings, public records, and attorney expertise.
For example, At Least the Fancy Lawyers Are Still Getting Rich features legal commentator David Lat and discusses Big Law, Trump administration settlements and lawsuits, AI in legal practice, Supreme Court developments, and the Monsanto decision. The episode is conversational but relies on legal-industry reporting, court outcomes, and professional legal context.
In The No-Judgment Fund, Barro and White analyze Trump’s proposed “anti-weaponization fund,” the federal Judgment Fund, legal standing, criminal charges involving an ex-AUSA, and several civil and criminal cases. The tone is humorous and occasionally provocative, but the discussion centers on legal mechanisms, statutes, procedural questions, and the limits of executive authority.
Similarly, Strictly Prohibited Ballroom discusses injunctions involving Anthropic, Trump’s ballroom project, PBS and NPR funding, ActBlue’s dispute with former lawyers, Tina Peters’ sentence, and wrongful termination claims involving FBI agents. The episode reflects legal analysis rather than partisan news coverage, though it includes clear opinions and rhetorical framing.
Overall, Serious Trouble demonstrates strong factual standards for a commentary podcast. The hosts generally distinguish between legal fact, prediction, opinion, and interpretation. Bias is best rated Right-Center due to Barro’s broader political orientation, White’s civil-libertarian legal perspective, and the show’s frequent skepticism toward both progressive and Trump-aligned legal arguments.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate Serious Trouble Right-Center biased based on its civil-libertarian legal perspective, pragmatic institutional analysis, Josh Barro’s broader right-center orientation, and frequent skepticism toward both progressive and Trump-aligned legal arguments. We rate it High for factual reporting due to transparent ownership, experienced hosts, reliance on legal filings and public records, and a clean fact-check record, while noting that it is opinion-based legal commentary rather than straight news reporting. (D. Van Zandt 06/27/2026)
Source: https://www.serioustrouble.show/
Last Updated on June 27, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources